I think I would disagree on the importance of getting a precise definition of this term, especially in isolation without any context."Anaerobic" sessions target improving form at high speeds -- teaching your muscles and nerves how to run at high speed without form breaking down."Anaerobic" interval sessions approach this with fast workbouts, and long recovery intervals, allowing the next workbout to be done as fresh as possible, prolonging fatigue, and the breakdown in form, while allowing a high volume of running at high speed.Your examples might qualify under some definition, but are not the best "anaerobic" sessions:- 100m hill repeats with walkbacks won't replicate the form, speed, and turnover required in racing on the track- continuous efforts (1500m and 3000m races) run a higher risk of fatigue inducing form breakdown in the latter stages, compared to equal volumes of interval trainingThey might possess some "anaerobic" value, but these are valuable also for other reasons:- hill repeats build leg strength with increased resistance, with less injury risk- continuous efforts put all factors (aerobic, anaerobic, metabolic, mechanical, electrical, psychological, etc.) together in a race contextJust my inputs.
Skuj wrote:
Yes yes, I know about google. And my favourite running book talks about a pace that is 100-130% VO2 max pace for runs of 30sec to 3min blah blah blah.
Basically anything at 3000m pace or faster for 200m to 1000m hard runs might do it.
But what if I run hard 100m hill repeats with walkbacks? Does that qualify as an "anaerobic capacity session"?
What if I race 1500m or even 3000m? Can that fall within the definition of an "anaerobic capacity session"?
It's important to define this precisely. Thank you for your input, letsrun.