Is this supposed to be interest or something?
Couldn't they use a real camera and an f2.8 lens instead of using lousy blurry cell phone?
This is why DSLRs and real cameras will NEVER be obsolete.
Three thoughts.
1) Uniforms are pretty cool.
2) Kate Grace. Wow.
3) If you are going to spend all that money, can't you hire a decent photographer?
Who is the girl on the left of Goucher?
Kara looks a lot cuter and a lot less old than those guys on the other thread claimed. What, are they liars or something?
Hmm Comments wrote:
Kara looks a lot cuter and a lot less old than those guys on the other thread claimed. What, are they liars or something?
They're gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) but they can't judge women.
Guys like us have a hard time judging if a guy is good looking.
Looks like they had fun. They almost all have the great ability to not stand up straight, which makes them look meek, like they don't own the runway. Well, Kate Grace owned it, but that's it.
Who was just in front of Kara in the video?
ton of makeup, and opinions vary. yours is no better than theirs. give it a rest. she's running nyc and her new sponsor is a big reason why. can you say exposure?
bland, boring colors, fabrics and cuts
The iPhone 5s has an F2.2 lens.....
really bad photos wrote:
Couldn't they use a real camera and an f2.8 lens instead of using lousy blurry cell phone?
This is why DSLRs and real cameras will NEVER be obsolete.
Kara looks good as do a few of the ladies,
But I mean the brand is a joke as far as running is concerned, hate it all they want, if your legit your with Nike. Some good athletes can get nice deals with Asics, New Balance and Saucony as well (Adidas mostly goes for east africans but there are some exceptions).
I see this brand as a novelty type of deal, it's cool for them I guess and I wish them all well but nobody running for them is going to be a world beater....EVER.
This is only slightly better then what Maggie Vessie is doing as at least it looks good and they have a traditional "kit"
just my thoughts tho.
Which is worse, Fleshman being referred to as a model or an elite athlete?
most overrated person on both counts
You dumb wrote:
The iPhone 5s has an F2.2 lens.....
really bad photos wrote:Couldn't they use a real camera and an f2.8 lens instead of using lousy blurry cell phone?
This is why DSLRs and real cameras will NEVER be obsolete.
an F2.8 lens on a camera would be equivalent to a < F1.0 lens on an iPhone sized sensor. pretty much all phone cameras have F2.0 - F3.0 lenses. They just produce shitty pictures because they have small sensors and terrible auto focus.
If Fleshman sucked her gut in anymore she would implode
in summary: wrote:
bland, boring colors, fabrics and cuts
Only woman was Britney Henry .
really bad photos wrote:
Couldn't they use a real camera and an f2.8 lens instead of using lousy blurry cell phone?
This is why DSLRs and real cameras will NEVER be obsolete.
Why go to the trouble of having a FASHION SHOW if you're going to take cell phone pics!!! Jeez! The whole point of super bright lights and all that jazz is so the photos turn out well! Of course, a cell phone camera isn't ready to take that kind of picture...
Your cellphone has a puny sensor and the equivalent f-stop is much different.
People rave about cell phone pics, but those "my cellphone is just as good as your DSLR" pictures are always in perfect lighting conditions with no action.
EVEN a mid grade DSLR like a 7D or D700 with good high ISO capability would blow away those photos, which are embarassingly poor quality for a professional photo-op.