First thought, who gets the movie rights and who plays SVH in the film? Reese Witherspoon sort of has the look, but Kiera Knightly seems more athletic.
First thought, who gets the movie rights and who plays SVH in the film? Reese Witherspoon sort of has the look, but Kiera Knightly seems more athletic.
student of the board-original wrote:
First thought, who gets the movie rights and who plays SFH in the film? Reese Witherspoon sort of has the look, but Kiera Knightly seems more athletic.
fixed the initials..
Is it true that 15 quid is all she asks for? I heard that in a song about her.
If you're feeling down depressed and lonely
I know a place where we can go
22 Acacia Avenue, meet a lady that I know
So if you're looking for a good time
And you're prepared to pay the price
Fifteen quid is all she asks for
Everybody's got their vice
Obviously Elisabeth Shue would play SFH.
She looks like her and has already played a hooker very well.
LetsRun.com wrote:
What do you think?
I think you ought to stop stalking her. Give it a rest.
People who crave anonymity don't blog.
She is obviously okay with her past situation. More power to her. Being anonymous means being afraid of your past. SFH does not have that fear problem. Most people are afraid of their past exploits.
Ray Allen played a bb player in "He's got game". So how about casting a real runner in her role. Melissa Bishop, a middle distance runner, would be my choice.
I think she does a book, not an interview. She might be shopping her story to Simon and Schuster right now.
Hamilton has blogged for the first time since 2000:http://suzyfavorhamilton.com/good-back/She says she now wants to share her story within in the next year but for the time being she's going to keep some controversial stuff in her "back pocket". We're reading that as meaning a book deal is coming. If it's not a book deal, we guess it could be some sort of paid Oprah type interview.The only other option we could think of is if there was some sort of deal reached with prosecutors to not talk about it for some period of time in exchange for charges not being filed.
SFH wrote:
As you probably have gathered, I’m pretty comfortable in my own skin these days, and I’m not afraid to go down what perhaps is not the safe & easy path. I’m not here to bash you over the head with my opinions, but I’m very hopeful what I say just might be thought provoking. The safe road is the route I previously took, every single time. Not any more, not after what I’ve been through. It’s liberating to say the least!
All that being said, if you’re looking for me to go all controversial on you in these first several blogs, it’s not going to happen. While that’s where I prefer to go, admittedly, I’m saving those in my back pocket. At some point in the next year, I do want to share my story, on my terms, and at that time, I’ll be more willing to open the topics up considerably. That’s when I see this becoming a lot more fun and interesting. Trust me, not trying to dodge anything here, and not pretending like 2012 never happened, but I have some very valid reasons for holding my tongue for the tine being.
What do you think?
The capacity of the people who run this place to forget the place of distance running in the public consciousness is boundless, and is only augmented by the ding-dongs who listen.
Marion Jones got on Oprah mainly because she was a black athlete went to jail. She was more successful than Suzy as well, and in a glamour discipline. There will be no comparable publicity in this case and not because Oprah's not on the air anymore.
If Suzy does a book it won't be because some publisher offers her huge amount of money to do it, and this won't happen unless she agrees to stoop to a level of tawdriness I'm sure that she won't.
So while it's fun to picture who they actors and actresses would be in a movie about Suzy's life, don't get your hopes up, not even for a Netflix-only or straight-to-DVD production.
You know what I'd like to hear about most in an interview with her? Her honest thoughts on that classless twat from Oakland who will never have to return what she stole from running, with SFH suffering the most. The hooking shit is of no interest to me.
The road back (Atonement) for her has always been a period of silence followed by interviews, followed by a book deal, followed by a TV movie, followed by more interviews. Why should she be denied due process?
Reese Witherspoon can play her in the movie.
All I got from what she blogged was:
skin...not afraid to go down...head...I previously took, every single time...in my back pocket...It's liberating...if your looking for me to go..on you...that's where I prefer to go, admittedly...but...tongue.
Lets hope this time it's a book deal and not a bonk deal
PRs: 800m - 1:58.10 (2000); 1000m - 2:33.93 (1995);
1500m - 3:57.40 (2000); Mile - 4:22.93 (1998); 3000m 8:46.16 (2000); 5,000m - 15:06.48 (2000)
Damn I forgot how fast she was.
but I have some very valid reasons for holding my tongue for the tine being.
Perhaps not the best choice of words….
Did SFH seriously just say that she wasn't afraid to go down...? I thought she was done with that.
Wonderful. The circus continues. I can't wait to hear how she justifies her behavior. I really do not find too much wrong with everything she did, but I am sure she has a great story. Hopefully, she takes a sense of humor towards herself.
LetsRun.com wrote:
Hamilton has blogged for the first time since 2000:
http://suzyfavorhamilton.com/good-back/She says she now wants to share her story within in the next year but for the time being she's going to keep some controversial stuff in her "back pocket". We're reading that as meaning a book deal is coming. If it's not a book deal, we guess it could be some sort of paid Oprah type interview.
The only other option we could think of is if there was some sort of deal reached with prosecutors to not talk about it for some period of time in exchange for charges not being filed.
SFH wrote:As you probably have gathered, I’m pretty comfortable in my own skin these days, and I’m not afraid to go down what perhaps is not the safe & easy path. I’m not here to bash you over the head with my opinions, but I’m very hopeful what I say just might be thought provoking. The safe road is the route I previously took, every single time. Not any more, not after what I’ve been through. It’s liberating to say the least!
All that being said, if you’re looking for me to go all controversial on you in these first several blogs, it’s not going to happen. While that’s where I prefer to go, admittedly, I’m saving those in my back pocket. At some point in the next year, I do want to share my story, on my terms, and at that time, I’ll be more willing to open the topics up considerably. That’s when I see this becoming a lot more fun and interesting. Trust me, not trying to dodge anything here, and not pretending like 2012 never happened, but I have some very valid reasons for holding my tongue for the tine being.
What do you think?
I think why the fck do you care rather than to prostitute out some click bait?
She is no longer a runner. Stick to real running news.
She is crazy... her QOD on the front page, "I'm not afraid to go down on..." like, does she do this on purpose?
She must be off her meds again. I can't image this is good for her husband and her daughter? I feel sad for her. She does not need to be back in the limelight. She needs to stay in therapy. I wonder whether she got a divorce and left therapy. I hope not she needs the stability of her family.