80
80
80
72 ==> 5:12
Is it worth like 5:04ish for a perfectly paced run?
80
80
80
72 ==> 5:12
Is it worth like 5:04ish for a perfectly paced run?
5:08
4:05. 4:02 tops.
You are NOT breaking 4 in the shape you are in.
Coincidentally, I just set a post HS pr in the mile today with a 5:12. With these splits, I wonder how much faster I can go on a perfectly paced run?
78
78
78
78
Almost a Master Troll wrote:
Coincidentally, I just set a post HS pr in the mile today with a 5:12. With these splits, I wonder how much faster I can go on a perfectly paced run?
78
78
78
78
3:59
For sure you are good for your first sub-4.
Sweet. Just a little bit more training then Coghlan better watch out! However, I'm technically younger than Lagat, so by the time I'm eligible, it'll probably be much lower than 3:58.
The Master Master wrote:
3:59
For sure you are good for your first sub-4.