Evidence that the moon may be an artificial structure. Quite compelling, actually.

Of course the moon is hollow. It's made of swiss cheese is it not?

Global Warming Scientist wrote:

Of course the moon is hollow. It's made of swiss cheese is it not?

And everyone knows it is in Arizona, they saw it on TV.

Global Warming Scientist wrote:

Of course the moon is hollow. It's made of swiss cheese is it not?

Of course make some dumb joke, and dismiss all other alternative theories immediately. Why not have an open mind, and collect as much information about something before a decision is made.

I'm not just criticizing you, but all people who never take time to actually think or do some research about new or different ideas.

Nothing in that article is compelling evidence. Nothing in that article is even evidence. Anyone who is compelled by that has little understanding of the physical world and how it works.

lol!

I was also taught the moon was made of cheese. Of course it is artificial. Have you ever seen cheese squirt out of a cow?

Boy I'm glad the moon was artificially created so we would not be wobbled to death.

Global Warming Scientist wrote:

Of course the moon is hollow. It's made of swiss cheese is it not?

Swiss cheese is NOT green.

Glad I could help clear that up for you.

[quote]Another personn wrote:

Of course make some dumb joke, and dismiss all other alternative theories immediately. Why not have an open mind, and collect as much information about something before a decision is made.

This is Letsrun. Home of Groupthink.

Onion wrote:

[quote]Another personn wrote:

Of course make some dumb joke, and dismiss all other alternative theories immediately. Why not have an open mind, and collect as much information about something before a decision is made.

This is Letsrun. Home of Groupthink.

Good point. Since science is the only methodology to test alternative hypotheses and come to understand the nature of the universe isn't it obvious that getting away from Groupthink requires us to consistently reject the conclusions of science?

I KNEW IT!!!

Another personn wrote:

Global Warming Scientist wrote:

Of course the moon is hollow. It's made of swiss cheese is it not?

Of course make some dumb joke, and dismiss all other alternative theories immediately. Why not have an open mind, and collect as much information about something before a decision is made.

I'm not just criticizing you, but all people who never take time to actually think or do some research about new or different ideas.

The other alternative theories are actually dismissed by the article, if you take the time to read it.

Oh yeah? Then how come, on Dumb and dumber, Jim Carey clearly shouts ; "they landed on the moon!"

How do you explain that?

Hah, I thought so..

Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:

Global Warming Scientist wrote:

Of course the moon is hollow. It's made of swiss cheese is it not?

Swiss cheese is NOT green.

Glad I could help clear that up for you.

Nor does it come from Swiss cows.

Glad I could hep clear THAT up for YOU!

Ironical wrote:

Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:

Swiss cheese is NOT green.

Glad I could help clear that up for you.

Nor does it come from Swiss cows.

Glad I could hep clear THAT up for YOU!

Yeah, right. You probably think it comes from Jersey cows.

And if you're so smart, where do you think the holes come from?

Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:

Ironical wrote:

Nor does it come from Swiss cows.

Glad I could hep clear THAT up for YOU!

Yeah, right. You probably think it comes from Jersey cows.

And if you're so smart, where do you think the holes come from?

If those are real holes, how did a man walk on it?

Ironical wrote:

Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:

Yeah, right. You probably think it comes from Jersey cows.

And if you're so smart, where do you think the holes come from?

If those are real holes, how did a man walk on it?

And if the moon is hollow why didn't the astronauts fall through the surface and plummet to their deaths?

As a side question - how hard would they hit the bottom of the crust on the opposite side of the moon if they fell through the surface? And how long would they fall?

Another user wrote:

And if the moon is hollow why didn't the astronauts fall through the surface and plummet to their deaths?

As a side question - how hard would they hit the bottom of the crust on the opposite side of the moon if they fell through the surface? And how long would they fall?

Because there was nothing to land on.

Well Now That You Mention It wrote:

Onion wrote:

[quote]Another personn wrote:

Of course make some dumb joke, and dismiss all other alternative theories immediately. Why not have an open mind, and collect as much information about something before a decision is made.

This is Letsrun. Home of Groupthink.

Good point. Since science is the only methodology to test alternative hypotheses and come to understand the nature of the universe isn't it obvious that getting away from Groupthink requires us to consistently reject the conclusions of science?

How to arrive at a conclusion that is 180 degrees off