Really? Meb's coach:"Anyone who runs a fast 10K can run a fast marathon.”- List of fast 10kers but failed marathoners

Pro News/Info/Results Marathons

Report Thread

You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
Optional
Reply
  • failed marathoner
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 7:25pm CDT
    Forum Index

    Anyone see the quote from Meb's coach Larsen that 'anyone who runs a fast 10k' is able to also run a fast marathon?

    Laron said:

    “There is certainly a skill set involved in going 26 miles beyond running a fast 1500 meters, but a guy who combines sub-3:30 (1500m) ability with the half-marathon, like Mo, yeah, I think he can do it. Whether he can his first time out in London, I don’t know, but anyone who runs a fast 10K can run a fast marathon, I think.”

    http://tonireavis.com/2013/10/01/will-1500m-speed-determine-marathon-limits/

    I certainly don't think so. It wasn't true for me back in the day. Let's come up with a list of fast 10k guys/gals that were failed marathoners.

    1. Zersenay Tadese 26:37 10k and 2:10:41

    Who else?
  • Ho Hum
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 7:36pm CDT
    re: failed marathoner
    Forum Index

    Just because someone didn't run a fast marathon doesn't mean he couldn't. With Tadese, for example, there had to be something more going on. There is absolutely no way you can't break 2:10 as a 58:20 half marathoner.
  • rojo
    cofounder
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 7:41pm CDT
    re: Ho Hum
    Forum Index
    Ho Hum wrote:

    Just because someone didn't run a fast marathon doesn't mean he couldn't. With Tadese, for example, there had to be something more going on. There is absolutely no way you can't break 2:10 as a 58:20 half marathoner.


    But 2:10 isn't fast for a 58:20 guy.

    I think the OP is talking relative to each other.

    Wejo: His 10k best 28:06. Marathon pb 2:18. That's not close to equivalent.
  • alltime 10k fan
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 7:51pm CDT
    re: rojo
    Forum Index

    The #4 and #5 fastest ever at 10,000 aren't exactly marathon stars.

    Nicholas Kemboi 26:30 10,000 at age 19. 4th fastest man ever. Marathon pb is just 2:08:30 and he's still 29.

    Not exactly failed but what happened to that guy?? Anyone?

    #5 Abebe Dinkesa Negera also a 26:30 10k guy at age 21. Now he's also 29 and his marathon pb is 2:14:33.

    -alltime 10k fan

    PS. I wouldn't be stunned if Meb's not a marathon star. Everyone seems to think he's a doped guy now thanks to the 3:28 but is it possible he's just more of a 1500/5000 guy who wins the 10k because it's a jog fest each time?

    Regardless, Larsson's comments were off.
  • hgc
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 7:54pm CDT
    re: rojo
    Forum Index
    rojo wrote:


    But 2:10 isn't fast for a 58:20 guy.

    I think the OP is talking relative to each other.

    Wejo: His 10k best 28:06. Marathon pb 2:18. That's not close to equivalent.



    That means wejo was doing something wrong. Like nutrition, hydration, etc.
  • Super Obvious Answer
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 8:06pm CDT
    re: rojo
    Forum Index
    rojo wrote:

    Ho Hum wrote:

    Just because someone didn't run a fast marathon doesn't mean he couldn't. With Tadese, for example, there had to be something more going on. There is absolutely no way you can't break 2:10 as a 58:20 half marathoner.


    But 2:10 isn't fast for a 58:20 guy.

    I think the OP is talking relative to each other.

    Wejo: His 10k best 28:06. Marathon pb 2:18. That's not close to equivalent.


    But have they done the Pfitzinger Advanced Marathoning training schedules or the Hanson's Marathon Method plans? I didn't think so.
  • Ho Hum
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 8:40pm CDT
    re: Super Obvious Answer
    Forum Index

    Well with Wejo, I don't know his training specifics, but it seems like he just didn't figure out the marathon. With Tadese, coaches on here have said that his training was always too fast and mileage pretty low.

    I think Ritz is a good example of what Larsen's talking about. Look at his progression: http://www.iaaf.org/athletes/united-states/dathan-ritzenhein-181857#progression

    Before his breakthrough in Chicago he's another "failed" marathoner, but given enough attempts he eventually put it together. I think Larsen is right on: any guy with Mo's wheels has the ability to run a fast marathon. Whether he will is anyone's guess. It probably depends on whether he makes the race a serious focus or not.
  • factoid
    7 years ago 10/01/2013 9:05pm CDT
    re: failed marathoner
    Forum Index

    Simon Bairu ran a 27:23 10K, was hailed as the future of Canadian distance running, but has never finished a marathon faster than 2:19.
  • long sox
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 12:15am CDT
    re: failed marathoner
    Forum Index

    On the women's side...

    Werknesh Kidane 30:07.15 and 2:26:15

    Her 10,000 PB is from 2003, but she also ran a 30:39 for 4th in the 2012 Olympics.

    Shalane Flanagan 30:22 and 2:25:38
    Kim Smith 30:35 and 2:25:21
  • survey says
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 1:59am CDT
    re: failed marathoner
    Forum Index
    failed marathoner wrote:
    anyone who runs a fast 10K can run a fast marathon, I think.”

    can =/= will
  • hey over here
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 5:07am CDT
    re: survey says
    Forum Index

    How about Meb? I know he\'s been an extremely successful marathoner(silver, NYC) but he\'s never popped a truly fast marathon. Ryan Hall is a minute slower than Meb in the 10,000, but three minutes faster in the marathon. Meb talks about running marathon PRs, but drops his time like Bubka raised his PV heights.
  • DC Racer
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 8:02am CDT
    re: failed marathoner
    Forum Index

    As quoted, then I agree the answer is "no." But if he had inserted the word "potential," as in anyone who can run a fast 10k has the potential to run a fast marathon, then that makes sense.
  • Nur Stel
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 8:08am CDT
    re: failed marathoner
    Forum Index

    On the American side, maybe Todd Williams, Lynn Jennings and Mark Nenow although their marathon PRs are very respectable.
  • PhoneixRunner
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 8:13am CDT
    re: rojo
    Forum Index
    rojo wrote:

    Ho Hum wrote:

    Just because someone didn't run a fast marathon doesn't mean he couldn't. With Tadese, for example, there had to be something more going on. There is absolutely no way you can't break 2:10 as a 58:20 half marathoner.


    But 2:10 isn't fast for a 58:20 guy.

    I think the OP is talking relative to each other.

    Wejo: His 10k best 28:06. Marathon pb 2:18. That's not close to equivalent.


    I would give him the benefit of the doubt. That was his first marathon right? Took Geb a few to get it right. Marathon is a different beast with fueling problems.
  • rojo
    cofounder
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 9:28am CDT
    re: Nur Stel
    Forum Index
    Nur Stel wrote:

    On the American side, maybe Todd Williams, Lynn Jennings and Mark Nenow although their marathon PRs are very respectable.

    Williams is 27:31-2:11:17 pb. That's certainly not equivalent, but it's not awful either. 27:31 is worth like a 2:09 (McMillan says 2:09 low, JK would say 2:09:20ish) so it would be like Farah running 2:07 instead of 2:05.

    Nenow is a better example 27:20-2:14:21 .

    As for Jennings, she ran 31:19.89 and 2:38:37 which is way, way off. 10 minutes so.

    But how many marathons did those guys/gals run? I only see one marathon result of Jennings. I guess one could argue they weren't running them as maybe they knew they wouldn't be good at them but also it was a different era when the money was on the track/roads for shorter stuff.
  • SMJO
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 9:35am CDT
    re: rojo
    Forum Index

    Keep in mind that Wejo had a really crappy coach who crippled him with all the wrong kind of running.
  • yea dude
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 9:39am CDT
    re: DC Racer
    Forum Index

    can = "has the potential to." it just takes less words.

    DC Racer wrote:

    As quoted, then I agree the answer is "no." But if he had inserted the word "potential," as in anyone who can run a fast 10k has the potential to run a fast marathon, then that makes sense.
  • Precious Roy
    registered
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 10:10am CDT
    re: PhoneixRunner
    Forum Index

    The level of specialization in the marathon and 10k is very high right now. Kipsang's runs splits in the marathon that are faster than his track 10k PR. That is not because he is slow on the track, but because he has been on the road and working up to the marathon since he first attracted the attention of agents. Someone who specializes in the 10k is going to need time to transition to the marathon. That is why some very fast guys on the track have yet to break through on the road. Also, guys like Tadese who do not have the best marathon times have generally gone out with the leaders and fallen apart. Tadese could have run 2:06-7 if he did not try to run 2:04-05. But the track guys are expected to win on their debut whereas their colleagues who have only raced marathons have had three or four races to develop before they start winning.
  • wejo
    cofounder
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 10:13am CDT
    re: hgc
    Forum Index
    rojo wrote:


    But 2:10 isn't fast for a 58:20 guy.

    I think the OP is talking relative to each other.

    Wejo: His 10k best 28:06. Marathon pb 2:18. That's not close to equivalent.

    I have to laugh being an example of one of the guys with a good 10k who couldn't run a good marathon. A 26:30 guy and 28:06 are very different.

    I never figured out the marathon for sure or any of the longer distances.

    The bigger thing I would say is I never finished a marathon after being a 28:06 guy.

    Heading into 2000 I was a 29:49 guy. I ran 28:27 that year and was I think 20th at the Trials in the heat in Pitssburgh. Not a disaster. I said I wanted to give myself a shot and halfway I was in the group that had the eventual winner (Rdd DeHaven)

    2001 I got 4th at USAs, ran 28:10 to win in McGill in Canada.

    I paced the men at Chicago sub 5:00 pace for 20 miles. Now a 28:10 guy perhaps should be able to do that for a full marathon but I wasn't ready for sure. That 20 miler was my #1 long distance effort of the year and was very, very hard. Nonetheless my pacing was excellent and very consistent and would I think indicate I could figure out how to do that for 6 more miles. NYC (my marathon) was 3 weeks later. Chicago was too much for me and my foot was bothering me by NYC. I died to 2:21.

    2002 I paced Paula to her WR. Wasn't planning on running the whole way but I got a bonus if she broke the WR and if she finished.

    2003 I ran my 28:06 to get 4th at USAs.

    2004 Injured and dropped out of Trials.

    So the way I see it I ran no marathons healthy after being a 28:10 guy.

    I still would like to run a marathon and feel like I ran it properly. I never felt I understood the distance.
  • HC
    registered
    7 years ago 10/02/2013 10:37am CDT
    re: rojo
    Forum Index
    rojo wrote:
    But 2:10 isn't fast for a 58:20 guy.

    I think the OP is talking relative to each other.

    Wejo: His 10k best 28:06. Marathon pb 2:18. That's not close to equivalent.

    What the OP is talking about is irrelevant. What Larsen is talking about IS relevant. 2:10 and 58:20 are both very fast and fit Larsen's quote and probably his intended meaning. You can go ahead and disagree but your entire disagreement is based on an incorrect inference, or at least an unsubstantiated one.