?
?
If you handle the barriers fairly well, your 3000SC time will be roughly equal to the two-mile (or perhaps 3200m)time that you were capable of at the time.
lease wrote:
If you handle the barriers fairly well, your 3000SC time will be roughly equal to the two-mile (or perhaps 3200m)time that you were capable of at the time.
this. case closed.
920 steeple guy wrote:
lease wrote:If you handle the barriers fairly well, your 3000SC time will be roughly equal to the two-mile (or perhaps 3200m)time that you were capable of at the time.
this. case closed.
second that
So Jager can do an 8:06 2 mile?
Nah, because Jager has excellent form compared to the other top competitors, and handles the barriers better than fairly well. I'd estimate somewhere between 8:10 and 8:15, which makes sense given his 3000 flat time.
10%-15%
bubbadeeboo wrote:
So Jager can do an 8:06 2 mile?
"Or perhaps 3200." An 8:06 3200 wouldn't be out of Jager's range.
Hardloper wrote:
bubbadeeboo wrote:So Jager can do an 8:06 2 mile?
"Or perhaps 3200." An 8:06 3200 wouldn't be out of Jager's range.
So he could do a 8:08 2 mile?
odpekdk wrote:
So he could do a 8:08 2 mile?
Since when is an 8:06 3200m equal to an 8:08 2-mile?
28 hurdles/seconds + 7 water jumps/seconds = 35 seconds
Hardloper wrote:
odpekdk wrote:So he could do a 8:08 2 mile?
Since when is an 8:06 3200m equal to an 8:08 2-mile?
It was a close enough estimate. Exactly how long do you think it takes to run 18 meters? I say 2-3 seconds. 8:08 is within that window.
odpekdk wrote:
It was a close enough estimate. Exactly how long do you think it takes to run 18 meters? I say 2-3 seconds. 8:08 is within that window.
Why would you guess when you can enter it in any of the 1,000 perfectly good calculators out there?
8:06.81 3200m -> 8:09.90 2-mile, just a hair under 8:10. And yes, an 8:10 outdoor 2-mile is within Jager's range.
Hardloper wrote:
odpekdk wrote:It was a close enough estimate. Exactly how long do you think it takes to run 18 meters? I say 2-3 seconds. 8:08 is within that window.
Why would you guess when you can enter it in any of the 1,000 perfectly good calculators out there?
8:06.81 3200m -> 8:09.90 2-mile, just a hair under 8:10. And yes, an 8:10 outdoor 2-mile is within Jager's range.
My calculator says 8:06 -> 8:08.7
What's a steeple?
Yeah, you guys are right. I just couldn't imagine Jager approaching Teg's old 2-mile record... I didn't recall Jager ever running any super impressive 3k/5ks that would suggest he's on par with Teg/Rupp, but he has the same 3k pr as Teg (7:34).
odpekdk wrote:
Hardloper wrote:Why would you guess when you can enter it in any of the 1,000 perfectly good calculators out there?
8:06.81 3200m -> 8:09.90 2-mile, just a hair under 8:10. And yes, an 8:10 outdoor 2-mile is within Jager's range.
My calculator says 8:06 -> 8:08.7
This thread had potential too.
I was under the impression, the faster you are (and therefore quicker over the barriers) the closer you would be to your 3200m best.
Bubbadeeboo wrote:
Yeah, you guys are right. I just couldn't imagine Jager approaching Teg's old 2-mile record... I didn't recall Jager ever running any super impressive 3k/5ks that would suggest he's on par with Teg/Rupp, but he has the same 3k pr as Teg (7:34).
I think it's still a ways off. 8:10 isn't 8:07, and 8:07 isn't the 8:03 that Mottram threw down on the same day. The 2-mile isn't run very often so it's easy to over-rate those performances.
They used to say that 2 mile PRs converted to a 3000m steeple projections, assuming average hurdling skills. So you can take the 3000 PR and multiple it by 1.0728 for a steeple projection.