Down goes the Dow

let me remind you gentlemen that you are speaking to the owner of 51 shares of Crocs.

Respect will be requested.

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3613206-crocs-guides-q3-revenue-above-estimates

I am extremely bullish for next week.

Earnings Scorecard: For Q2 2020 (with 100% of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results), 84% of S&P 500 companies reported a positive EPS surprise and 65% reported a positive revenue surprise. The second quarter marked the highest percentage of S&P 500 companies reporting a positive EPS surprise since FactSet began tracking this metric in 2008.

Earnie wrote:

Earnings Scorecard: For Q2 2020 (with 100% of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results), 84% of S&P 500 companies reported a positive EPS surprise and 65% reported a positive revenue surprise. The second quarter marked the highest percentage of S&P 500 companies reporting a positive EPS surprise since FactSet began tracking this metric in 2008.

)Insight/2020/09.2020/09.04.2020_EI/S%26P%20500%20Q320%20Bottom%20Up%20EPS%20Dec%2031-Aug%2031.png?width=1824&name=S%26P%20500%20Q320%20Bottom%20Up%20EPS%20Dec%2031-Aug%2031.png

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://themarket.ch/interview/edward-chancellor-prudent-investing-is-impossible-these-days-ld.2606

So this clown has been saying we have been in a bubble over the last 13 years ...

Mr Chancellor, we often hear financial markets are in a bubble. Is that true?

"Almost immediately after the central bank response in 2008, we observed a resurgence of bubbles. Since then, there were more bubbles around than in every period we find data. It’s almost hard to think of an asset which hasn’t built a bubble at some stage over the last twelve years."

He will be saying that for another 10 years and together will be almost a quarter-century that he has claimed the financial markets have been in a bubble. Meanwhile, many here have become millionaires while this naysayer has been bleeding his clients dry. What a clown.

Igy you haven't answered my question if you prefer a return of 28% over 2019 or negative 0.49 or so. If you can't answer that with a serious answer (and you won't) then you are not a serious contributor here.

Sally Vix wrote:

Igy you haven't answered my question if you prefer a return of 28% over 2019 or negative 0.49 or so. If you can't answer that with a serious answer (and you won't) then you are not a serious contributor here.

flumokins wrote:

I am extremely bullish for next week.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://themarket.ch/interview/edward-chancellor-prudent-investing-is-impossible-these-days-ld.2606

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Igy you haven't answered my question if you prefer a return of 28% over 2019 or negative 0.49 or so. If you can't answer that with a serious answer (and you won't) then you are not a serious contributor here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5dCPn1JGPg

I am sure your clients get a huge chuckle when you send them silly videos when they want to know why their portfolios have done nothing over the last 13 years sitting in laddered CDs while their friends and other family members heavily invested in the stock market have become millionaires.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5dCPn1JGPg

I am sure your clients get a huge chuckle when you send them silly videos when they want to know why their portfolios have done nothing over the last 13 years sitting in laddered CDs while their friends and other family members heavily invested in the stock market have become millionaires.

Russian troll wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://themarket.ch/interview/edward-chancellor-prudent-investing-is-impossible-these-days-ld.2606

https://twitter.com/hipster_trader/status/1303762920946446336?s=21

Bummbell Model Portfolio has had a tough September. Perhaps time to swap into the Sally Vixx Model Portfolio.

?‍♀️

Scary......

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Bummbell Model Portfolio has had a tough September. Perhaps time to swap into the Sally Vixx Model Portfolio.

?‍♀️

Scary......

Igy - here are your 2 choices for 2019 ...

28.55% - S & P 500

Negative 0.49% - CDs

Which would you prefer? If you can't answer that with a serious response then you are not a serious contributor here.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Bummbell Model Portfolio has had a tough September. Perhaps time to swap into the Sally Vixx Model Portfolio.

?‍♀️

Scary......

Igy - here are your 2 choices for 2019 ...

28.55% - S & P 500

Negative 0.49% - CDs

Which would you prefer? If you can't answer that with a serious response then you are not a serious contributor here.

Portnoy has previously said he has no "great knowledge" of stocks. If retail investors follow his actions and lose money, he "can't be held responsible for total idiots."

With that said, the full results from this week's survey make it clear most readers would prefer to stick with the 89-year-old investing legend:

David Portnoy: 34.2%

Warren Buffett: 65.8%

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Bummbell Model Portfolio has had a tough September. Perhaps time to swap into the Sally Vixx Model Portfolio.

?‍♀️

Scary......

Are you wanting to compare our performance? We can compare with my down number right now. But actually, it doesn’t even matter as I’m looking at long term. When market tanks, I’ll have plenty of bonds so no worries.

You’re absolutely pathetic and only want to compare when market is at the very bottom and say that your CDs outperform S&P500.