Says he's still the record holder:
http://www.webpronews.com/lance-armstrong-still-champ-according-to-armstrong-2013-06
Says he's still the record holder:
http://www.webpronews.com/lance-armstrong-still-champ-according-to-armstrong-2013-06
He's Texan. Nuff said.
lanceness80 wrote: Says he's still the record holder:
He is correct. The fastest-doper of the tour-dopers.
Least Doper wrote:
He is correct. The fastest-doper of the tour-dopers.
Or perhaps the best responder of all the tour dopers.
He is still the record holder. Who won the tour from 1999-2005? Lance Armstrong. He is right that it was impossible to win the tour clean.
Guillotine wrote:
Never tested positive, same as elfie rupp and bobblehead radcliffe.
You do realize Lance finally confessed to using PEDs, right? Sort of takes care of the "never tested positive" claim by the Lance fanboys.
Go Lance! We are 100% behind you!
The crazy thing is Lance made the Tour de France. Without Lance there is no money or attention to any of it.
He is the worst and the best to all of them.
Everyone knows he was one of many. So Lance can be blamed. But for Cycling - he did as much good as he did harm...
You do realize they ALL DOPED, EVERY YEAR, right? Good job singling one of the 1000s out. You're smart!
Apparently some riders in the peloton don't agree with you... Hamilton and White both apologized to all the clean riders.
Curious if all the Lance defenders would also defend Rupp to the bitter end if it was ever proved that he doped.
I love Google Translate:
"Since his confession hypermédiatisés January with the 'priestess' of the American talk show, Oprah Winfrey , former seven-time Tour de France will land in silence."
Oprah: Priestess of the American Talk Show.
Not that it's that far off--just that it's funny.
Lance may not be the official winner of the tour de france anymore but we're proud to say that he is still a two time NYRR ING NYC Marathon Finisher and no one is going to take that from him.
tstock wrote:
He is still the record holder. Who won the tour from 1999-2005? Lance Armstrong. He is right that it was impossible to win the tour clean.
He's right about that, because any clean rider trying to win the Tour during Lance's era would have had to deal with the doped up USPS team.
Just to continue on his path of arrogance:
Makes Sense wrote:
The crazy thing is Lance made the Tour de France. Without Lance there is no money or attention to any of it.
He is the worst and the best to all of them.
Everyone knows he was one of many. So Lance can be blamed. But for Cycling - he did as much good as he did harm...
Are you drunk, or is this your normal level of stupidity?
All Real Americans wrote:
Go Lance! We are 100% behind you!
You can't be serious??
Makes Sense wrote:
The crazy thing is Lance made the Tour de France. Without Lance there is no money or attention to any of it.
He is the worst and the best to all of them.
Everyone knows he was one of many. So Lance can be blamed. But for Cycling - he did as much good as he did harm...
you obviously know nothing about cycling.
The Tour is the biggest sporting event in the world outside of the Olympics (and maybe the World Cup) and takes place EVERY YEAR.
Long before Armstrong and for long after, the Tour will retain that status.
Armstrong had little to do with that in the grand scheme of things.
Of course I am. If other nations had drug agencies headed by, IMO, maniacs with personal axes to grind, how many riders would be left to fight for the podium?
If you are going to go after dopers, go after all of them with equal zeal.
The race itself is a turd. The Turd of France.
How people can watch a peloton crawl down the road 5 hours a day for 3 weeks is mind-boggling. It's like a 21-round golf tournament on a 36-hole course, which would probably be wildly popular too.