So here's the scenario: ALL MUST RUN 5 MINUTE KM PACE. That's it, take it or leave it. You want to run faster? Go register for a different race. But for THIS race, you're running 5 minute km pace.
Would you?
So here's the scenario: ALL MUST RUN 5 MINUTE KM PACE. That's it, take it or leave it. You want to run faster? Go register for a different race. But for THIS race, you're running 5 minute km pace.
Would you?
Would there be any purpose or incentive? I don't see why anybody would participate unless there was some benefit I'm not seeing.
It's like a parade of some sort. You would not be able to call it a race.
Oh, and it sounds terrible
5 minutes per kilometer. Is that fast or slow?
Is this a "who can go the longest" type thing?
That's not a "race" so this doesn't make sense
Yeah. I'd sign up to run a 4:10 50k training run with my gal pals.
I would do it out of respect for them using "per kilometer" pace instead of "per mile" pace.
But no marathons. Retarded distance.
ugly dumb american wrote:
5 minutes per kilometer. Is that fast or slow?
8 min/mile you decide.
Basically studies are done in this manner where a person runs (or cycles) at a fixed intensity until he/she can no longer continue (exercise to exhaustion). However, this is not a race where the definition (in this context) is a contest of speed. Or, I think most people would look at it as a contest to see who gets to a finishing line or point first.
ugly dumb american wrote:
5 minutes per kilometer. Is that fast or slow?
5x 5 km = 25 mins.
a 25 min 5k.
really? can you really not think for half a second and try to figure out how fast a 5min km is?
I mean, come on.
Does it have a cool shirt and beer at the finish?