LETS MF RUN wrote: Based on the physical evidence, he is still a 6 time tour de france winner. And besides, most of the evidence for his other doping violations were mostly by witness testimony as well.
No he isn't. You yourself quoted three separate incidences of doping for which there is physical evidence. Someone caught doping three times would have probably received a 1 year ban on the first instance, a 2-4 year ban on the second instance, and a lifetime ban on the third instance. The history of cycling would have played out very differently, but there is no way he would have been able to win 6 tour titles, even if you only rely on the physical evidence for doping.