A lot more impressive than the 5K one.
A lot more impressive than the 5K one.
probably only a handfull of the stanford and ivy league guys that have accomplished this
Yep. 1960s = 31m30s. 8k PR around 29m. Don't remember the score exactly, but it was around there.
Unless you try to tell me that "1960" = "19:60," = 20:00, but that would be stupid.
no, but my teams 4x800 relay time was the same as my math score...counts for something right?
Hello, friends.
wat belachelijk wrote:
Yep. 1960s = 31m30s. 8k PR around 29m. Don't remember the score exactly, but it was around there.
Unless you try to tell me that "1960" = "19:60," = 20:00, but that would be stupid.
No, you're stupid. This question is getting at the guys who got 2400 and have run sub 24:00. No one is at all impressed with your pathetic SAT or 8k.
beat cal wrote:
probably only a handfull of the stanford and ivy league guys that have accomplished this
Given that a perfect score is 2400 and the fact that only a handful of guys each year can break 24:00 in the 8k I sincerely doubt that anyone is capable of doing this. Prove me wrong LR
Depends if you count 10k track splits.
hobo w/shotgun wrote:
beat cal wrote:probably only a handfull of the stanford and ivy league guys that have accomplished this
Given that a perfect score is 2400 and the fact that only a handful of guys each year can break 24:00 in the 8k I sincerely doubt that anyone is capable of doing this. Prove me wrong LR
puuuuulease wrote:
Depends if you count 10k track splits.
hobo w/shotgun wrote:Given that a perfect score is 2400 and the fact that only a handful of guys each year can break 24:00 in the 8k I sincerely doubt that anyone is capable of doing this. Prove me wrong LR
Even still you are talking about dudes who are in the 23's in both I can't think of anyone capable of running that time and who almost maxed out their SAT's. Does anyone know the SAT scores of the top 10k guys?
How good was Chris Derrick's SAT? He seems smart but this is a very impressive feat to accomplish.