With your total break time at 1 hour or less?
With your total break time at 1 hour or less?
No.
highly doubt it
What kind of hiking is it? If you count something almost entirely flat and even, maybe. If you mean on a steep, rugged trail, definitly not.
I don't see why not. If you averaged 3.5 miles per hour for 30 hours that is 105 miles.
The cutoff time for most 100 milers is 30 hours, but some are more and Hardrock is 48. Many finishers take that long and spend less than an hour at aid stations, but the terrain is often mountainous and at high elevation. So walking at a fairly brisk pace on a relatively flat surface it is definitely doable.
I'm completely sure mentally I could.
I can't really say I see the point. Naps and decent meals would be too hard to pass up.
Are you carrying a pack full of food or is this hike supported? What kind of terrain we talking? How hot is it outside? Are you alone or with others? I feel like there is just way too many variables here for a person just to say yes or no.
Assume it's at 5,000 feet average elevation with max elevation of 6,000 feet. Total elevation gain of 15,000 feet. 75F is max temp and 45F is min temp. No rain. Alone. Fully-supported aid every 10 miles (water, food, etc.)
I could physically finish it if the alternative was death but otherwise I'd get bored and go to sleep.
I think I could do this if I'm completely supported, the hard thing is that I would need to be fueling more consistently than every 10 miles. I would have to atleast have a camelbak for water on.
I should be more clear. Every 10 miles, you'd be able to load up with whatever food, water, etc. that you wanted. In the 10 miles between aid stations, however, you'd have to carry everything yourself.