I noticed many "unattached" runners in the results from USA nationals. Does that mean these individuals are unaffiliated with any team/group and are paying their own way to compete at the meet?
If so that's pretty disappointing. I mean, these individuals are in the top 10 or 20 in the US in their respective track event and they can't find a sponsor (even a small one). Do you think that's by choice or lack of available opportunities?
That got me thinking, what would a reasonable agreement look like to sponsor one of these athletes? I own a small business and would consider sponsoring someone. I wouldn't have any expectation of increased revenue/brand recognition/goodwill from doing so (it's a small niche market, unaffiliated with running or anything related), but I'd at least want the athlete to list our company name as their "affiliation" in races and maybe put our name on their singlet (just so it's a legitimate advertising expense). It would be an opportunity to give back to the sport and to provide an opportunity for someone pursuing their dreams. I wouldn't want to take an active role in their coaching/racing/management. More like I'd just give them some money/gear, with some stipulations, and leave them to take care of the rest. No long term commitment or anything. If they improve enough to get a shoe contract I'd gladly let them move onto that better opportunity.
So I ask you, how would you structure an appropriate sponsorship deal for one of these unattached, notional level athletes. What would it take to make a significant positive difference to someone in this situation without costing too much? What kind of support do these athletes need most? What are some pitfalls to avoid?