Gay may not run the 200m at the US trials

Yeah. My impression of Tyson Gay has always been that he is dishonest.

19.19 < 19.32

I don't know how you can call Michael Johnson the best 200m runner ever.

Also, I have no idea what you're trying to say in your post.

Did you get that impression from knowing him? I'm guessing not, because if you actually knew him then you would know you couldn't be farther from the truth.

Gay's great times in spite of injury aren't a testament to his dishonesty, but rather his amazing natural ability that everyone underestimates.

aerobic wildebeest wrote:

19.19 < 19.32

I don't know how you can call Michael Johnson the best 200m runner ever.

Also, I have no idea what you're trying to say in your post.

Idiot! Do you lack the ability to read and comprehend? Do you understand tense, preposition or maybe the English language? Ok! Maybe you don't, so let me help you out. Michael Johnson "is arguably the best 200m runner ever". The word arguably is used as what in this statement? As a matter of fact look up the definition b4 you respond?

This post basically states that if you are an injured sprinter the last event you would think about running even if the money was in the millions is the 200m. May I remind about why we never saw a Michael Johnson vs. Donovan Bailey part II or why Sanya Richards refuse to run the 200m. This event when it comes to injury isn't something that you play with, their are hundreds of runners who at one point in his/her career ran the 200m but due to injury had to move up in distance or move down and this is a fact not an opinion.

Where did you get "I, Tyson Gay, think I can beat Usain Bolt in a 200m race" from "It is very difficult to say when I will run a 200"?

Is it that you think, by attributing his unwillingness to race a 200m to injury, he is implying that he can contend with Usain Bolt when his training is back on schedule? Or perhaps that, were he free of injury, he would be beating Usain Bolt?

Either way, I think you're reading way too much into this. I also think you need to get a life.

James Lee what are you talking about?

1. Hating on his 19.41 straightaway 200m which is a WORLD RECORD

2. Taking Gay's statement out of context, and saying he can't challenge Usain

3. Saying Gay hasn't been injured.

Your post is BS through and through.

You know nothing about Gay, his battle with injuries, or his confidence levels.

Why slander the American record holder with a bunch of fictitious claims?

Btw, Gay ran 9.91 through 100 in his 150m at the manchester city games. Bolt has yet to break 9.9, so Gay challenging Bolt at either 100 or 200m shouldn't be a question.

Sprinter A wrote:

James Lee what are you talking about?

1. Hating on his 19.41 straightaway 200m which is a WORLD RECORD

2. Taking Gay's statement out of context, and saying he can't challenge Usain

3. Saying Gay hasn't been injured.

Your post is BS through and through.

You know nothing about Gay, his battle with injuries, or his confidence levels.

Why slander the American record holder with a bunch of fictitious claims?

Btw, Gay ran 9.91 through 100 in his 150m at the manchester city games. Bolt has yet to break 9.9, so Gay challenging Bolt at either 100 or 200m shouldn't be a question.

AMEN my god you hit the nail on the head, Mr James Lee seems angry lol. He is making assumptions with no proof. Well you know what they say about accusations. lol

All now none of you have given me a legitimate reason for Tyson Gays refusal to run the 200 at championship meets since 2008. This conversation is about the 200m not the 100m and my point is if he is as injured why does even waste time to mention the 200m. No one asked him about the 200m because 19.19; 19.30; and <19.4x is not in his league, he decide to speak about the 200m.

Here goes some food for thought Tyson Gay is a true 9.7-9.8 100m runner but, have you notice that his time has not change drastically even though he is never 100%(so he claims). So let me get this right Tyson Gay is the first and only sprint in the history of Track and field to PR while injured and maintain a range that he could not reach when he was 100% healthy...ok then and the bullshit continues.

TYSON GAYS TIMES WHEN HE WAS NOT 100% HEALTHY

9.79 06/11

9.79 08/10

9.78 08/10

9.77 07/09

9.77 07/08(last event b4 his real injury)

9.71 08/09

9.69 09/09

TYSON GAY TIMES WHEN HE WAS 100% HEALTHY

Put it like this he broke 9.8x once and that time is posted above.

It is exhausting to try and read what you are writing. go to sleep and try again tomorrow

hmmmm wrote:

It is exhausting to try and read what you are writing. go to sleep and try again tomorrow

LOL! I read his latest post 3-4 times and couldn't put it all together.

Hey James. You're an idiot.

You've obviously never had a groin injury.

A quick tip: don't bag on another person's utilization of the English language while your own is absolutely pitiful. Really, it makes one look like a fool.

Nairobi blows wrote:

A quick tip: don't bag on another person's utilization of the English language while your own is absolutely pitiful. Really, it makes one look like a fool.

Sorry for not using my spell check b4 posting my comments...My English is fine but my proof reading needs some work.