biking is not running
Lance Armstrong 10k Results
Other Running Related Topic
-
00
-
#1: Top-rated Training Shoe: Brooks Ghost 15 for $99Get a top 1%-rated shoe right now for $99 (30% off) -
Gee, 28:54 for 10k's not bad.
00 -
trainer wrote:
Gee, 28:54 for 10k's not bad.
Indeed 28:54 for 10K is not bad, but what does that have to do with Lance?
00 -
Indeed, but what does the title have to do with cyclist's aren't runners.
00 -
what in the nug?
00 -
I can't speak for twelve years in Austin (or seven years in Tibet for that matter), but I think maybe he was referencing the 42 minute 10K talked about in the article, although Lance stated that was giving away 3 minutes at the start to stay out of traffic with the baby jogger. So maybe it was 39 minutes pushing jogger, still not so bad but not exactly challenging Geb for the title. Agreed it's kind of a vague and lame post to start with - need to let it die.
10 -
Anyone recall a story from running w/ the legends about Deek running Bolder Boulder w/ his kid in a baby jogger and running some really fast time cuz he was just too competitive to kick back and jog?
00 -
It would be funny if you actually won a race with a baby jogger.
00 -
If I recall right Jerry Lawson did just that a few years back, 14:58 5k I believe.
00
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun