This info was on another thread, where it was pointed out that Jim Ryun's first sub-4:00 high school mile was run only ten years after Bannister's. To illustrate the kind of hype that Ryun encountered, we were asked to imagine what it would be like if an American HS kid ran a time in 2010 that was faster than what the world record was in 2000.
But *all* the outdoor records in the 1500/mile, back in 2000, are *still* the records today!
Men's mile: 3:43.13, Hicham El Guerrouj 1999
Men's 1500: 3:26.00, El G 1998
Women's mile: 4:12.56, Svetlana Masterkova 1996
Women's 1500: 3:50.46, Yunxia Qu 1993
All these marks in (what used to be?) The Sport's marquee events were set in the last millennium. Despite all the "sophisticated" pacing setups* of the last decade, only rarely has anyone even come close to these marks.
Not sure that there's a particular point here, but I can remember when attacks on the records in these events--sometimes in strictly-competitive (i.e. non-paced) races--were fairly frequent. It amazes me to think that the men's 100m record has fallen farther in this century than the mile or 1500 record has.
Thoughts?
*Don't get me started on the pacing. I think it's a plague on the sport, and wish the old rules of disqualifying obvious pacing efforts were still in effect.