Last summer a middle-aged, male 5K finisher died in front of his family, at the finish line, from coronary problems. Despite the obvious possibility of a pre-existing condition, it was no doubt also the result of him participating on what was a very warm humid evening.
I watched the entire episode. Spectators were immediately there to assist, as I was, if necessary. Parameds were there soon enough but lifesaving steps were apparently not enough.
I recently read that the family is naming the Parameds, PepsiCo (a sponsor) and the local running store which supports this race series, many others, and is an active local racing supporter in a lawsuit for related damages. Their major contention is that Parameds nor Police did not use difibrulator and that despite the usualy signed waiver, the sponsors were negligent in providing proper support.
I believe the Paramed providers are always fair game. Naming Pepsi and running store is horse shit. While a waiver alone, shouldn't let anyone completely off the hook, where is the negligence for a tiny race which had no need for on site parameds for less than 100 finishers?
I have been running and racing for 30 years. My Dad, who was actually a strong runner, died from heart failure at 47 on a long training run. I have run over 200 organized races, the best and the worst. I saw the entire thing unfold, would probably be able to provide a good testimony and I don't want to see the business owner get hurt.
Should I get involved?