Are middle to upper class more attractive than lower class

the research suggests that those with great money wealth have higher levels of education, thus are healthier and earn more money.

the stats dont lie.

in saying that, the class system to classify individuals is false as too many different interpretations exist to individual differences.

forget what you see, dont be shallow and allow coin to determine who you like or dislike.

simply like them all, and root the hots ones you get a hard on from!

Poor people are more likely to be fat. fat people are unattractive. Therefore, poor people are more likely to be unattractive.

The key for you will be to move back to the ghetto and visit/admire from afar. The best bet is to keep your living conditions real and play in the land of “beautiful people” to ensure you don’t get sucked in to the cult.

The more likely scenario is that you will stay too long in suburbia and become desensitized to the fabricated attractiveness, realize that most are pretty ugly on the inside and become just another bitter Republican with a preternatural white smile.

That was a scarily accurate description of white America.

Jefe in the CO wrote:

a preternatural white smile.

nailed it!

Rich people will "marry down" for good looks - hence the gene pool for the rich has gradually moved toward better-looking over time.

Many of the rich are also inbred. Britain is a good example of that.

That was a rambling, idiotic response. Terrible transition between points, with a token immature/idiotic political bash at the end, in hopes of gaining some support.

Basically, you're a douche.

Oh, and I live in the "city."

I just wanna be "sussessful" wrote:

That was a rambling, idiotic response. Terrible transition between points, with a token immature/idiotic political bash at the end, in hopes of gaining some support.

Basically, you're a douche.

Oh, and I live in the "city."

Shut up.

fdfd wrote:

Jefe in the CO wrote:

a preternatural white smile.

nailed it!

where's my crowbar?

Well, a lot of poor people smoke. Plus, they tend to work blue collar jobs. Nothing ages you like cigs and hard labor.

A rich 50 year old can look better than a poor 30 year old.

Poor women work. They work shitty jobs that don't leave them time or energy to exercise or put in much effort on looks.

Rich women in suburbia generally do not work. I honestly don't know what the hell they DO do, since most wealthy families I know have landscapers, maid service, etc. They have nothing to do but look good.

Not all upper class folks are like that, in fact a rich Republican is more likely to be sincere and genuine then a rich Democrat who is all fake and full of BS.

Don't let the 'thin air' distort your thinking.

I don't agree with most of these other responses, but all these women you see are trophy wives. Their husbands are probably just as fat as the guys you lived around, but they cover those pounds with nicer clothes. These fat rich guys married these milfs because they were hot, so if they loose it they'll get booted to the street. There's also tons of free time and money to spend looking nice.

Screw the "rich people aren't fat because they're educated" crap. The working rich don't have time to work out and eat carry out at least 2 meals a day.

Sunday Funday wrote:

I don't agree with most of these other responses, but all these women you see are trophy wives. Their husbands are probably just as fat as the guys you lived around, but they cover those pounds with nicer clothes. These fat rich guys married these milfs because they were hot, so if they loose it they'll get booted to the street. There's also tons of free time and money to spend looking nice.

Screw the "rich people aren't fat because they're educated" crap. The working rich don't have time to work out and eat carry out at least 2 meals a day.

It's hard to really believe what someone's arguing when they don't know the places to use "lose" and "loose". Not saying you're wrong, just hard to feel confident about what you're saying.

DontBeJealous wrote:

...in fact a rich Republican is more likely to be sincere and genuine then a rich Democrat...

Okay, your airtight argument convinced me.

in the chuck phalniuk novel Rant there's a line about how poor rural towns trap good looking people. Good looking guys screw good looking girls, get pregnant and never make it out of the town,kid has good genes and is good looking, finds some one to impregnate/be impregnated by etc etc....

obviously this idea is based soley in phalniuk's imagination and is supported by no evidence, but just a theory

La La La La La wrote:

It's hard to really believe what someone's arguing when they don't know the places to use "lose" and "loose". Not saying you're wrong, just hard to feel confident about what you're saying.

It's after midnight. Give me a break.

I think the simple answer is that unhealthy food is the cheapest per calorie. Plus when you are poor, the chepest entertainment and pleasure you can have is filling your belly with salt, sugar, and fat.

I can't understand why I can buy a gallon of high-end premium ice cream cheaper than I can buy Oikos (Greek yogurt). Or even regular yogurt, for that matter. Marx, who obviously was better at diagnosing problems than solutions, once observed that for the working class, the only pleasures they have available are the animal ones since their jobs don't afford much in the way of "flow" activity.

Watch what people put in their carts at Walmart - they have absolutely no conception of macro nutrient requirements or anything. I see whole carts that have no actual food in them.