USA 20K Championships online?

Pro News/Info/Results Roads (Non Marathon)

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3

Next Last

14 years ago 09/08/2009 11:38pm EDT

re: CT runner

ummm, just fyi....it takes around 4-6weeks to get said test results back....so no, there would be no overnight changes in standings. I do agree, people need to just take a chill pill and do something other than refresh letsrun.com every two min looking for results...go paint your house or something, sheesh!

CT runner wrote:Fellas. Relax. Those of us that we actually AT the race, understand why they posted "unofficial". The race was drug tested. So, there might, not for sure, but MIGHT be a change in the results if anyone's test is positive, right?.

14 years ago 09/09/2009 6:45am EDT

re: old washed up has been

I run in local race in the New Haven area of CT. The 20k race, si by far the biggest and Best race of the year in this state. BY FAR!

The results were on line when I got home from a post-race BBQ that evening. Unlike the earlier posts, I actually have a social life that does not revolve around results from a race. I do things with other people.

14 years ago 09/09/2009 8:53am EDT

re: NewHaVeN

Were you in the kids race on Monday?

14 years ago 09/09/2009 11:04am EDT

re: Caster Semenya

Caster Semenya wrote:
Were you in the kids race on Monday?

___________________________________________

This is the kind of post that serves NO purpose at all.

From what I have read, 6000+ runners. Results posted by 2 PM, after drug testing delayed awards etc.

I'm not sure what the problem is.

Was Boilermaker faster? No. Beach to Beacon? No. Falmouth? No.

In New England, most races post a morning race that afternoon. I agree with the New HaVen person. Lives do not revolve around results within 45 minutes, outside the people who are there. and, for those of us that were there, the results were up on the wall by 11AM.

14 years ago 09/09/2009 12:03pm EDT

re: runcool

I can see why Carney tanked a little- leading for that long and rattling off sub 4:40s will get you every time. If he had shared the lead a little, he may have finished up much better.

14 years ago 09/09/2009 12:14pm EDT

re: runcool

runcool wrote:
and, for those of us that were there, the results were up on the wall by 11AM.

Which means they could have been put online at the same time. You helped prove the point of the complainers.

14 years ago 09/09/2009 4:29pm EDT

re: great point

great point wrote:
runcool wrote:
and, for those of us that were there, the results were up on the wall by 11AM.
Which means they could have been put online at the same time. You helped prove the point of the complainers.

____________________________________

First, complainers is not I title I would relish. Second, if the timer is in their van doing the timing, how then can they put up results? It is the job of the race director. Who, by the way, is directing the race.

And last, what life and eath situation is affected by results not posted immediatley in a road race?

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3

Next Last

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

USA 20K Championships online?

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.