CRAIG PICKERING , FASTEST WHITE GUY EVER?

CRAIG MOTTRAM IS FASTER

How was this guy fast? He was only a little above 5'8" and his lower legs look pretty short. He doesn't look very fast. I think Craig Pickering will go under 10s if he doesn't have a serious injury

10.18 and 20.30, hes right there in the argument

matt shirvington at 10.03?

I realize it's at 400m, but I think we have to think about Jeremy Wariner.

I was hoping it was going to be JT Schuerman (10.3X, 20.6X, 46.25 in HS) but he has actually gotten worse since getting to Baylor a few years back.

Australia's Patrick Johnson ran 9.93.

Germany's Armin Hary ran 10.0.

Marian Woronin 10.00

Peitro Mennea 10.01

Matt Shirvington 10.03

Pickering's run was wind aided

Blowing Rock Master wrote:

Australia's Patrick Johnson ran 9.93.

Germany's Armin Hary ran 10.0.

I think Johnson is half white and half aborigine.

3200guy wrote:

Blowing Rock Master wrote:

Australia's Patrick Johnson ran 9.93.

Germany's Armin Hary ran 10.0.

I think Johnson is half white and half aborigine.

Exactly. There has NEVER been a person of majority european ancestry who has broken 10.00 in the 100, even the roid freaks of the eastern block couldn't do it. And Bolt has run under 9.7. Talk about achievement gap.

German Muenster wrote:

Exactly. There has NEVER been a person of majority european ancestry who has broken 10.00 in the 100, even the roid freaks of the eastern block couldn't do it. And Bolt has run under 9.7. Talk about achievement gap.

My friend, if you believe Bolt isn't on drugs, I want whatever you're smoking. His eyes are so full of something, its very easy to tell. He has the exact same look Ramzi did, Ben Johnson did, Barry Bonds did...

Somebody, not from Jamaica, saw what he was doing as a youth, decided to juice him up last 2 years and throw him at the world for $$$$.

The IAAF president turns his head, because the $$$$ is going to poor 3rd world shitholes and might actually help them somewhat.

If you actually believe this freakshow, and thats all sprints are, as 'dominance' of any sort, again I want whatever you're smoking.

A) I am not your "friend", and like everyone else you've ever met, wouldn't be if you paid me

B) "his eyes are full of something"... THAT's your proof. You are regular peer reviewed source, you are

C) I didn't say he wasn't on drugs. CAN YOU READ SPARKLES??? I said even the roid freaks from eastern bloc couldn't break 10. So EVEN if Bolt is on drugs, he is 3 friggin 10th's ahead of the fastest drugged white man. Even playing field = ACHIEVEMENT GAP.... like the one that exists between you and all your classmate who finished ahead of you in school.

ha ha ha....you forgot to bring up white guilt, PC liberal media, and my sociology professor who brainwashed me. quit the lame white power tired boring excuses. Blacks are faster at sprinting than whites. A LOT FASTER. End of story, period, no more discussing it. But no, you got to grasp at conspiracy theories and the white man being held down by the IAAF rather than accept a fact that is so f***ing obvious, a blind me could see it. Wow are you a f***ing piece of work.

Armin Hary's 10.0 would be 10.24 with the hand to auto conversion, right? Plus, no false-start blocks test like today.

Do not start to build genetic explanations on the very slim basis of a quarter of a second difference between extreme outliers in an event contested by fractions of the populace, and moreover, rife with drug use (and Europeans today are so overwhelmed with the racist idea that black people are genetically superior in sports that they barely even try in track--Europeans don't typically touch what they used to do back in the day, before this defeatist attitude came up; doesn't the example of Wariner say something to you?). Of the sub-10 guys, there is a pretty substantial fraction that have gone down for drugs. Ben Johnson was well over 10 with drugs. Justin Gatlin, a huge talent, was on drugs. Carl Lewis, a huge talent, may have been using. Dennis Mitchell was using. Tim Montgomery, less of a talent, was using. When you look at the American women from the 100m/200m 2000 Olympic trials and see that almost all of them were using, you will take another look at the men as well and wonder whether any of the sub-10 guys were clean.

stupiderer wrote:

Do not start to build genetic explanations on the very slim basis of a quarter of a second difference .

Yeah, .3 is reaaaaaal slim margin the 100. Are you insane? I guess I won't "build genetic explanations" to explain the differences between the genders either on "the very slim basis" of less than 1 second in the 100. Right?? You, know, 3/4 of a second is "slim", so I guess men and women have no genetic differences, right einstein? Wrong.

3/10's is huge. Get over it.

I should have said that Johnson was well over ten with drugs after he had been caught the first time.

German Muenster

Why are you so angry?

Where did I once hit on some white power parade?

What are you blowing on dude...chill out, its letsrun.

And Bolt is roided up his ass in juice.

Bolt/Bonds/Ben makes no difference. He'll slip up and he'll be caught.

Had nothing to do with White/Black whatever. You also fail in logic, whatever Bolt is on, Pickering is probably not on, as he doesn't have the money or endorsement to do it.

Pickering also has more brains, if he was that fast he'd make sure he got more money. Thats why the druggers find the dumbest 3rd world trash they can, like Bolt, drug him up, and say he's getting a great deal, while they juice him, then loot the money. Get it?

Make the mental connection...

Bolt was chosen because he's stupid and his juicers get more on the back side, remember its all about $$$$$.

"dumbest 3rd world trash"????? what makes you think you are in any position to judge someone else?