Hello,
I have heard that one of Jordan's cross-country goals is to run a sub 17 minutes on a 5k course.
But if you take her time in San Diego (february 16th 2008), 20:32 minutes (6,000 meters).
32/60 = 0.53
20:32 = 20.53 minutes
20.53x5/6 = 17.06 minutes (5k)
So, a simple time conversion gives a great 5,000 meters time. But I wonder what was her real 5k time on that race.
Maybe it was a sub 17 ?
Does anyone have an idea about that ?
Thanks for the answer.
you are such a sad loser. why would anyone care what some teenage girl can run over a 5k xc course,
get a life, and realise that this girl is not even a patch on stephane twell
loco majo wrote:
you are such a sad loser. why would anyone care what some teenage girl can run over a 5k xc course,
get a life, and realise that this girl is not even a patch on stephane twell
You´re just jealous because you´re not the one having sex with her.
Thank you very much for your help, STUD.
I am used to that kind of mean guys. So, it's ok.
Nevertheless, I still really want to know the answer to my question.
As there is no proportionality, I just wanted to know what number is usually used to convert a 5,000 into a 6k or the opposite (For example, when you convert a 1,500 meters to a mile time, you have to apply a coefficient (1.0815) due to the fact that a runner can hardly keep the same pace on a longer run).
That's why I think the probability Jordan ran the first 5k in less than 17 minutes last february in San Diego is very high.
They had splits every kilo, so her 5-k time will be available somewhere. Sorry, I don't have a chance to look right now.
OK, so I had a little time: http://www.usatf.org/events/2008/USAXCChampionships/results/jw_splits.asp
Thanks "Ghost of Ashenfelter" for the USATF link.
It's completely different of what I expected but more impressive.
If you take the intervals between two kilometers from the second, you have for Jordan :
3'31" 3'25" 3'21" and 3'16".
It's Negative split each time !!
loco majo wrote:
you are such a sad loser. why would anyone care what some teenage girl can run over a 5k xc course,
get a life, and realise that this girl is not even a patch on stephane twell
You talk about him him being a loser for talking about a teenage girl yet then you mention one at the end of your post. Nice f***ing job, f***.
loco majo wrote: and realise that this girl is not even a patch on stephane twell
Realize that you are a stupid Brit (not saying Brits are stupid, just you). Twell ran 4:12.76 at about the same age that Hasay ran 4:14.50. And Twell ran 9:07 for 3k, whereas Hasay ran 9:51 for 3.2k (at a younger age (about 3 months)against hs runners)
Twell's times are a bit better, but hardly dominant at the same age in the same events.
Twell has started to become a super-star following her teen success, but Hasay is still 2 years younger than her, so we don't know how she will turn out in comparison.
most 9:51 and 4:14 runners can easily break 17 on a moderate course and 16 on a faster
nt2007 wrote:
Hello,
I have heard that one of Jordan's cross-country goals is to run a sub 17 minutes on a 5k course.
But if you take her time in San Diego (february 16th 2008), 20:32 minutes (6,000 meters).
32/60 = 0.53
20:32 = 20.53 minutes
20.53x5/6 = 17.06 minutes (5k)
So, a simple time conversion gives a great 5,000 meters time. But I wonder what was her real 5k time on that race.
Maybe it was a sub 17 ?
Does anyone have an idea about that ?
Thanks for the answer.
Well she ran 17:05 as a frosh. I say she spanks it. The big question is...will more than 1 girl break 17 at FL Nationals this year? Could be an epic year if everyone stays healthy.
She ran 17:02 on Woodward park her freshman year. I think this was at the Clovis Invitational, she ran a slower time at the state meet. At last year's state meet, she ran a 17:05 in Division 5. Christine Babcock ran 17:04 in Division 2, for the fastest time of the day.
Her times at Mt. Sac (around 16:40, correct me if I'm wrong) show that she is capable of running sub 17 on a course like Woodward park.
Anyone think she can get Chock's 5k record? I believe that was around 15:52 or so, 12.5 laps on the track. Last year she ran the 1500 at the Cardinal invitational in Stanford, if she went for the 5k record there she could get some great competition. Could she break 15:52?
Her 4:14.50 also converts faster than the actual mile record (around 4:35). As for her 3200 9:52, 4 seconds off of the #1 time (her's is the #2 all time), this was run at the end of May.. she clearly was peaking for early July, at the Trials.
Who knows, by the end of this track season, she could have the 5k and 3200 records under her belt.. not to mention "officially" getting the mile record (not converted from a 1500).
What do you all think?
On one of the running sites she states her workouts are faster than last year. So if she remains healthy and improves the potential exists for her to become the fastest female US HS runner from 1500 to 3200 ever. It would be great for US track.
at some point in time, she will have to become a woman.
she can't be peter pan forever.
hahaha
Brasovan went 16:46, so why would Hasay only care about a sub-17:00 5K? Of course Hasay can sub-17:00 in XC.
"him" is a her.