Disgraceful female runner wrote:
I also can't stand that Mikitenko had her own personal pacemaker all the way through. What about running at least a few miles non aided?
That might have been unfair in terms of margin of victory, but it wasn't unfair in terms of winning the race. That scenario was created by Mikitenko's smart pacing and the too-fast first 15k by the ones in the 2:18 pace group. If they had kept their pace going, they probably could have had company and stayed ahead of Mikitenko. Conversely, if they had started out with Mikitenko's group, they might not have cracked as soon and could have had the same pacers as Mikitenko did the whole way. But they chose to run too fast early and lost the race. Their losing obviously didn't have anything to do with pacesetters, since they were still with their original pacers when Mikitenko caught them. They were about to get dropped in any event.
As far as having company all the way to the end and running 2:19 instead of 2:20 or slower, yeah, the pacers helped in that regard. That's just the sketchy part of a mixed race - the winning woman is more likely than the winning man to find a good deal of company all the way to the finish line. But if there's competition to be had, having companions all the way is part of a race, period. Nobody's complaining that Geb had Kwambai to run with for a few ks near the end, but the shared rhythm at that stage of the race might have helped him get the sub-2:04. Same with Tergat and Korir in that first sub-2:05. Was that race "unfair" since the "rabbit" pushed Tergat all the way to the tape?
Bottom line, if the other women had been good enough to win, they could have just hung on with their original group at 2:18 pace or latched on with Mikitenko's group when it caught them or just started out with Mikitenko's group like they should have in the first place. But clearly Mikitenko ran a better marathon than they did.