predict my time for 100m/200m

prolly around 21.3 200m id say. whats ur pb dog?

how about you just try running a 200?

22.flat/22lowpoint and 10.7/10.8

price of tea, your an idiot. think about it, 12.8 say he is running the 100m in 10.8 like you say then that means he is on 1m/s pace when he hits 120m, that will slow a little but probably not substantially in a competitionmeaning he would hit 200m at very least under 21.5 . alternativly, if you say he is running 22.0 then that means he is on 1.2 - 1.3 m/s pace and went through 100m at around 10.4 - 10.5 . your obviously not a sprinter. i would say from these 120 times youll be running around 21.5 or under, alternativly 10.6 or under in the 100 if they are for real

I am absolutely sick and tired of all these "predict" this and that threads! Dude, go to your local track, stand behind the 200 meter mark, and run all out and record your time.

For goodness sake it's 200 freaking meters...stop being lazy and just do it and stop wasting room on this board with all of these predict my time threads. After all, none of you never come back and actually share what ever happened, which is even more weird.

Dude....

Yeah. I mean you ran 120m 3 times. How hard would it have been to run an extra 80m on one of those? And I'm assuming these sprints were run at close to race speed since you tired and ran progressively slower with each repeat. So instead of doing that workout, why didn't you just run 100m, rest 10 minutes, and then run 200m? Your problem would have been solved. Your times may have not been 100% accurate, but you would have a pretty solid idea of how fast you could run in competition.

hey fool, this guys a sprinter, running a 200m full out right now is probably not a good idea this early in the season. its akin to someone wanting to know there mile time from workouts going to the local track and ruinning a full out mile, thus the predictions. fool. if you dont like this post dont reply. personally i would say 100m-10.7 200m - 21.8/ PEACE

13:15

Depends on several things: How hard you ran the first one, how they were timed, and how much speed endurance work you've done for 200 (special endurance in the 250-350 range).

Someone in shape should be able to run 120-150 at the same pace as 100, but 15 seconds is about as long as you can maintain close to max speed and beyond that point the SE becomes vastly more important.

If you ran roughly 13 FAT for 120, you would likely be in the 10.4-10.5 range, but if this was timed from first movement from standing, you have to add about 0.6 to the time.

People normally can run double the 100 time only if they've been doing the overdistance work, and this is typically worth 0.5-1.5 second extra in a 200 compared to a 100.

I would say if it was timed from first movement a 12.8 is about a 10.7 or 21.5 roughly in competition FAT. are you a 200m or 100m specialist?

no, more like 11.5

oops, i thought that was 110 time, k like 10.5, but this is unrealistic, i doubt a guy running that fast in a 120 would be posting on here, he probably would already know what he can run, 12.8 for a 120 is flying, most top ncaa guys i know in the sprints would be doing about that

haha distance runners wrote:

hey fool, this guys a sprinter, running a 200m full out right now is probably not a good idea this early in the season. its akin to someone wanting to know there mile time from workouts going to the local track and ruinning a full out mile, thus the predictions. fool. if you dont like this post dont reply. personally i would say 100m-10.7 200m - 21.8/ PEACE

Yeah you know, those people who do that thing indoors, called racing on fridays and saturdays, they are really not helping themselves at all, and should stop doing it before they injure themselves.

actually buddy you probably think your being so smart in saying that but in reality your an idiot. ALL the best sprinters in the world do not run 200m indoors, they may run 60's which is fine but they never go overdistance. yes there are NCAA athletes but thats their MAIN FOCUS, also ncaa outdoor nationals are way sooner so there is less chance for burnout by then.

your a dummy man

actually buddy you probably think your being so smart in saying that but in reality your an idiot. ALL the best sprinters in the world do not run 200m indoors, they may run 60's which is fine but they never go overdistance. yes there are NCAA athletes but thats their MAIN FOCUS, also ncaa outdoor nationals are way sooner so there is less chance for burnout by then.

your a dummy man

1 - many of the top coaches use various methods to predict times, you will never see jeremy wariner/asafa/tyson gay running full out in their specific event this early never. so to suggest that the best way to evaluate progress is to just run the event full out is nothing short of retarded.

2 - this guy asked a legit question and got for the most part a bunch of critcism, why cant you just answer the question or not reply its that easy

3 - I am an assistant coach for a prominant NCAA team and judging by your times (i assume they are HT) and method used to run (i assume 3 point start or lean and not out of blocks) your looking at 10.6-10.8 and 21.3-21.8 really depending on conditioning

Just so the young and impressionable aren't confused:

In standard English, the contraction of "you are" is "you're"--the apostrophe stands in place of what's missing.

In standard English, "your" is the second-person possessive.

Example: "Your poor command of standard English shows that you're in need of further education."

sorry i dont proofread my internet forum posts, i actually have a life and other things to do. oops my dont should have an apostrophe. Oh no.

please tell me you have changed since this