I say Lukezic in 11.39
I say Lukezic in 11.39
lukezic sux.
webb owns every TRUE american in practically every distance.
that is funny !
Ritz is projected to have 11.1 speed Lukezic cound't beat Ritz in the 100 :)
Webb is projected to have about 10.6 speed in the 100 so yes he would win
webb could run a 10.5 without any specific training for it.
why are we talking about 100m? that is THE most overrated race distance!!!
it takes no strategy whatsoever! and sprinters can eat whatever they want and only have to put up with pain for 10-12 seconds.
this is letsrun, lets keep it about REAL running events.
asu guy wrote:
that is funny !
Ritz is projected to have 11.1 speed Lukezic cound't beat Ritz in the 100 :)
Webb is projected to have about 10.6 speed in the 100 so yes he would win
wtf?????? Ritz couldn't put up 11.1 with a running start. And Webb is nowhere near 10.6 in a million years.
whats web 400 pr , surely he could go a 47.xx
who cares........stop speculating on something that can't be proved.
get a life, make plans to move out of your parents basement, buy your mom a present, wrap it yourself, and give someone a nice Christmas.
didn't Webb run a 47 in high school? Surely he's as fast as any other decent highschool sprinter. What i mean by that is that a 10.6 is definately within his ability, or it at least used to be. How many high school 47 400m runners do you know that can't run a 10.6?
A LOT, you are over estimating what 47 point is worth. We have had 45-46 point runners on my team who have to hussle to break 10.7 mid.
I have split 47 on numerous occasions but seriously doubt I could go sub 11, I bet lukezic & webb can split 46 but still doubt sub 11
Both are probably in the 11.2-11.5 range for 100m..... comparing them to sprinters doesn't work because they are running those 47s off of endurance rather than speed
you don't think that Webb is a lil more anerobic than the average elite distance runner?