looks like we will never see a sub 2:20 from this gal ever again.
looks like we will never see a sub 2:20 from this gal ever again.
////// wrote:
That's the same thing people were saying about your Mom when she announced she was having you.
how do you know, wiseguy?
federerer wrote:
looks like we will never see a sub 2:20 from this gal ever again.
Actually, we probably will. Barring age as a confounding factor, pregnancy actually aids female runners (assuming they lose their pregnancy weight) because their capillary density, epo, growth hormones, etc. skyrocket.
svetlana masterkova set her PR's and got her double olympic golds and WC golds after taking two years off for pergnancy. it can help a lot. the russian girl who set the WR in the indoor 3000 took time off for pregnancy and improved as well.
dfere wrote:
////// wrote:That's the same thing people were saying about your Mom when she announced she was having you.
how do you know, wiseguy?
Everyone in the fleet was talking about it.
crazy much? wrote:
svetlana masterkova set her PR's and got her double olympic golds and WC golds after taking two years off for pergnancy. it can help a lot. the russian girl who set the WR in the indoor 3000 took time off for pregnancy and improved as well.
In 1982, Ingrid Kristiansen inadvertently ran a 2:33 marathon while four months pregnant. Four months after giving birth, she won the Houston Marathon in 2:27 and three months later set the women's world record in the London Marathon in 2:21. So I would think there's every chance that we could see another sub-2:20 from Radcliffe.
I think this is a very dangerous discussion.. some people may try and impregnate webb and rhitz.. sincerely
Dem Be Jan wrote:
I think this is a very dangerous discussion.. some people may try and impregnate webb and rhitz.. sincerely
The next step in performance enahnacement is obviously virtual pregnancy. Labs across the world will now be racing to discover a way to induce pregnant symptoms, minus the baby.
federerer wrote:
looks like we will never see a sub 2:20 from this gal ever again.
You must be a complete moron.
great times does not always come after having a baby....
Suzy, Marla, etc...
Cheri Goddard Kenah is another good example for not producing fast times after having twins!
Anyone who could conceive a child with that bag of sticks gets my vote for heterosexual of the year.
all-time post-childbirth world records?
anybody a big enough geek to generate that one? i'd be interested to see...
Whats your problem....?
federerer wrote:
great times does not always come after having a baby....
Suzy, Marla, etc...
has Suzy even had her baby? and even if she just did, she hasn't raced it, so you can't exactl;y use her as an example now can you???