Is this like his wish to prosecute James because, without evidence or clear charges, the President is “very guilty of something”?
Is that kind of like the way he recommends not taking Tylenol based on, as he says, “just what I feel” about ace-fmerweohwe, ahhh-acembnoanammm, a—ceee-taminophen? (Hey, he might actually have a blind-squirrel-and-a-nut moment on being right: I just don’t think that’s a basis for offering medical advice or carrying out criminal prosecution).
And will this basically wind up like the results of Comey’s investigations and the Mueller report, which led to evidence of wrongdoing but circumstances that didn’t warrant prosecution (some people like to mislabel that “completely exonerated,” so I imagine if there is insufficient evidence or other reasons not to charge any targets of the current DOJ’s investigations, those people will similarly say those under suspicion are also “completely exonerated” and totally “innocent”)?
She prosecuted Maxwell and would have prosecuted Epstein. If he didn’t die in Prison under Bill Barr and Trump.
She is the one who would have met with Maxwell for any discussion instead of Trumps personal defense attorney Todd Blanche. Blanche decided to move Maxwell to club Fed prison.
James Comey was almost single-handedly responsible for Trumps victory in 2016, when he made a big announcement about reopening an investigation into Clinton's private emails less than two weeks before the election. Of course, nothing came of that, and the trump administration now improperly conducts most business over private, insecure channels, but it completely swayed the election. The idea that Comey is some deep state lib is preposterous.
This is a complete joke and just a desperate attempt to get revenge on someone who Daddy has a grudge against. We know this because he JUST tweeted out explicit demands for his corrupt justice department to investigate his political rivals. These charges are being brought by an incompetent Trump sycophant who has never prosecuted a case in her entire career.
If the people prosecuting Trump were just throwing stuff at a wall (as trump is doing here), why did juries find the evidence compelling enough to convict? I already know your answer: "They were all democrats." lol.
The derp-de-derp crew: “Did he actually lock her up?”
Yes, that’s because he never really wanted to and let his conscience and sense of propriety take over. No chance at all that he was dissuaded and/or undermined by staffers and spent time stewing over the decision. No chance at all.
The derp-de-derp crew: “Did he actually lock her up?”
Yes, that’s because he never really wanted to and let his conscience and sense of propriety take over. No chance at all that he was dissuaded and/or undermined by staffers and spent time stewing over the decision. No chance at all.
Does that mean that Bragg was right to prosecute his case? No. And that’s not my point.
Justice is justice, and people who think “turnabout is fair play” are leaders in the race to the bottom.