Thoughts?
Isn't that the equivalent of a guy with 3 incher posting a pic of himself in a speedo?
Thoughts?
Isn't that the equivalent of a guy with 3 incher posting a pic of himself in a speedo?
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
Thank you, this is exactly the kind of motivation I’m looking for.
“The beauty of their women and the taste of their food make brits the best sailors in the world.” sorry sirpoopy we still love you
This post was removed.
not sure if I\'d do this myself wrote:
Thoughts?
Isn't that the equivalent of a guy with 3 incher posting a pic of himself in a speedo?
No, a couple seem a bit chubby but most seem young, not middle aged, and decently fit looking for average people. I’d say they are more like healthy 6 inchers.
So, all of the ACTUAL opinions are getting deleted?
Wow, both of my posts got removed. You don't deserve me!
I could work with that.
13079 can get it
Handy wrote:
13079 can get it
Sorry, best you can do is 24158.
The perpetually confused Tyler Robinson would probably dig on a few of them.
13079 is a 10 for sure. Good for all these ladies. Stay fit and happy.
The picture of women in bun huggers will not have a positive outcome with increasing this publication’s numbers.
this is now acceptable because weirdos like Fred Kerley started prancing around in bun huggers to. Moved the Overton window way out into la-la land. So this is no longer extreme at all.
This post was removed.
4, 6, 6, 5, 7, 7, 8, 7, 5, 3, 3, 7, 6
Be Nice! wrote:
13079 is a 10 for sure. Good for all these ladies. Stay fit and happy.
Meh. 8 at best. 10? Rare, very rare. Most in that picture are average, 4s and 5s. No problem with the picture, good to see people out moving....
That one in the front kind of looks like “Mary, that’s my name!” From Christmas Vacation.
Proud of these women. Good on ‘em!