I used to think kind of similar, but thanks to this forum, I changed my mind. Even though the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Australia, etc. is a toxic food environment in which almost everyone should live with some kind of restriction - (Americans eat 70%+ of their diet from processed food) - there is still a small percentage of people in the Western world who can eat whatever they want and not gain weight, but this does not mean they're healthy! I have many relatives like this. Junk food addicts, yet they're still thin or normal weight. However, they have many health problems.Even though they're not overweight, I wonder - to what degree - their health problems are caused by their steady diet of ultra-processed crap!
Whenever I see an overweight person, I don't blame them. Not anymore! Go to a doctor and ask them about addiction nutrition and see what they say. OR go to a registered dietician and ask them, "Can you please explain to me what is addiction nutrition? I would like to stop being addicted to certain foods" and see what they say. Blank stares.
The obesity crisis can be blamed on a few factors - it's like the perfect storm. 1) BIG TOBACCO could no longer suppress the health data on cigarettes in the late '70s and they were looking for a new industry to invest their business model, it's called the Addictive business model. The addictive business model depends on five factors, called the five A's.
a) Addictive product formulation: Howard R. Moscowitz (PhD from in Experimental Psychology of Marketing from Harvard. He's worth 45 million today ) formulated the "Bliss Point." He went around to each food corporation in the mid-80s changing the nutrition in processed food so that the products would have the maximum amount of sugar, fat, & salt possible before the consumer would notice. An egregious example is pasta sauce: 1/2 cup of store-bought pasta sauce has the same amt of sugar as 2 Oreos.
b) Affordability: in 1980, high fructose corn syrup came on the market. Therefore, the processed food industry did not have to rely on the "sugar cartel" to maximize the addictive nature of their products (sugar is one of the addictive foods!) Corn is subsidized by the U.S. government, therefore HFCS is cheap.
c) Advertising: Advertising for addictive nutrition is everywhere. In particular, in the 1980s Big Food hyped up their advertising to children (which relates to the last point, "get the consumer hooked at the youngest age possible"): in 7 years, Big Food advertising to children went from 150 ads per Saturday morning, to 550 ads for addictive foods.
d)
Availability: Big Tobacco companies already had the "in" at the corner stores, gas stations, vending machines. They replaced cigarettes with addictive foods. They took out the cigarette vending machines, and replaced them with junk food vending machines. They used to sell cigarettes at the corner stores/gas stations - now replace it with addictive food.
e)
Age: Get the consumer addicted at the youngest age possible. So, this is just taking a page from Big Tobacco: they tried to advertise to the youngest age they could (10-year-old boys) with the "Joe Cool Camel," and Congress stepped in! Big Food lobbied against long-term paid maternity leave because that could cut into their profits on baby formula. Note: baby formula contains High Fructose Corn Syrup, so Big Food is marketing to infants with additive nutrition. Also, the amounts of ads to children greatly increased when Big Tobacco bought Big Food. Get 'em hooked young. UCSF has internal documents of Big Tobacco trying to addict children with sugar as far back as 1963. (UCSF researchers have 40,000 internal documents from Big Tobacco).
Between 1985 - 1987, Big Tobacco bought
Kraft,
Nabisco,
General Foods,
Dannon Yogurt and employed the addictive business model to unknowing consumers.
Information on bliss point