Pushing the jab on kids and pregnant women was insane.
-
3827
-
Good news.
Can't believe they still had pregnant women on the recommended list
2923 -
The big psychological hurdle that most people can't get over is the correct answer to the following question - Did Fauci really ignore all negative health consequences of the Covid vaccines and Remdesivir just so him and his buddies could make billions of dollars?
The correct answer puts Fauci on par with the biggest war criminals of the last hundred years.
4437 -
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
The big psychological hurdle that most people can't get over is the correct answer to the following question - Did Fauci really ignore all negative health consequences of the Covid vaccines and Remdesivir just so him and his buddies could make billions of dollars?
The correct answer puts Fauci on par with the biggest war criminals of the last hundred years.
Exactly. Especially considering the virus was likely made and released from the Wuhan Fauci associated lab. Time for Trump team to launch an actual investigation and not have these con artists investigating themselves and finding no wrong doing as usual.
2223 -
Never should have been there for healthy individuals under 25. Pregnancy is another issue. Women are effectively immuno-compromised while pregnant, so I would need to see a detailed risk / benefit study post omicron to make a determination one way or the other. Maternal mortality has been at pre-pandemic levels for about the past two years in spite of roughly 14% booster uptake among pregnant women, indicating that there is limited benefit from vaccination.
1513 -
joedlrt wrote:
Never should have been there for healthy individuals under 25. Pregnancy is another issue. Women are effectively immuno-compromised while pregnant, so I would need to see a detailed risk / benefit study post omicron to make a determination one way or the other. Maternal mortality has been at pre-pandemic levels for about the past two years in spite of roughly 14% booster uptake among pregnant women, indicating that there is limited benefit from vaccination.
The last thing a pregnant women should do it pump an experimental drug into their bodies
1818 -
For “healthy pregnant women.” Considering that about 80+% of women have a risk factor due to pregnancy symptoms alone, the vaccine is mostly still recommended for pregnant women. But props on their PR stunt
1727 -
joedlrt wrote:
Never should have been there for healthy individuals under 25. Pregnancy is another issue. Women are effectively immuno-compromised while pregnant, so I would need to see a detailed risk / benefit study post omicron to make a determination one way or the other. Maternal mortality has been at pre-pandemic levels for about the past two years in spite of roughly 14% booster uptake among pregnant women, indicating that there is limited benefit from vaccination.
Yes mortality is the only thing that matters. Moms should not care if they get hospitalized while pregnant due to COVID. We shouldn’t even consider that.
Regardless, the women getting COVID now while pregnant have all been vaccinated so your analysis should probably consider that. In 10 years that may not be the case with new recommendations.
RFK has already managed to slaughter kids in Samoa and Texas. Looks like he isn’t content with that alone but considering this stunt does not actually limit access to the vaccine at all, his bloodthirst may not be quenched.
1925 -
Harambe wrote:
joedlrt wrote:
Never should have been there for healthy individuals under 25. Pregnancy is another issue. Women are effectively immuno-compromised while pregnant, so I would need to see a detailed risk / benefit study post omicron to make a determination one way or the other. Maternal mortality has been at pre-pandemic levels for about the past two years in spite of roughly 14% booster uptake among pregnant women, indicating that there is limited benefit from vaccination.
Yes mortality is the only thing that matters. Moms should not care if they get hospitalized while pregnant due to COVID. We shouldn’t even consider that.
Regardless, the women getting COVID now while pregnant have all been vaccinated so your analysis should probably consider that. In 10 years that may not be the case with new recommendations.
RFK has already managed to slaughter kids in Samoa and Texas. Looks like he isn’t content with that alone but considering this stunt does not actually limit access to the vaccine at all, his bloodthirst may not be quenched.
You’re upset. Why so?
86 -
Harambe wrote:
joedlrt wrote:
Never should have been there for healthy individuals under 25. Pregnancy is another issue. Women are effectively immuno-compromised while pregnant, so I would need to see a detailed risk / benefit study post omicron to make a determination one way or the other. Maternal mortality has been at pre-pandemic levels for about the past two years in spite of roughly 14% booster uptake among pregnant women, indicating that there is limited benefit from vaccination.
Yes mortality is the only thing that matters. Moms should not care if they get hospitalized while pregnant due to COVID. We shouldn’t even consider that.
Regardless, the women getting COVID now while pregnant have all been vaccinated so your analysis should probably consider that. In 10 years that may not be the case with new recommendations.
RFK has already managed to slaughter kids in Samoa and Texas. Looks like he isn’t content with that alone but considering this stunt does not actually limit access to the vaccine at all, his bloodthirst may not be quenched.
Mortality is indicative of all of those other things as well. Hospital use rates are at or below pre-pandemic levels (inpatient admissions are below pre-pandemic levels and emergency department admissions are slightly below pre-pandemic levels) for the population as a whole. You are desperately trying to hold on to the past.
64 -
#11
This post was removed.
-
#12
This post was removed.
-
joedlrt wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Yes mortality is the only thing that matters. Moms should not care if they get hospitalized while pregnant due to COVID. We shouldn’t even consider that.
Regardless, the women getting COVID now while pregnant have all been vaccinated so your analysis should probably consider that. In 10 years that may not be the case with new recommendations.
RFK has already managed to slaughter kids in Samoa and Texas. Looks like he isn’t content with that alone but considering this stunt does not actually limit access to the vaccine at all, his bloodthirst may not be quenched.
Mortality is indicative of all of those other things as well. Hospital use rates are at or below pre-pandemic levels (inpatient admissions are below pre-pandemic levels and emergency department admissions are slightly below pre-pandemic levels) for the population as a whole. You are desperately trying to hold on to the past.
Your “analysis” is about as uncontrolled and low information as possible.
There’s ample evidence that vaccination protects mother and baby from severe disease.
For now, most women have gotten 3 doses so they are well protected and their babies will be as well. In a few years we will see more first time mothers who are unvaccinated. Infants will be harmed by this.
It’s funny, there’s so much evidence that the vaccine is protective for mothers and infants and you’re just ignoring it, why? No interest in the truth?
Me: we should keep infants out of the hospital
You: stop trying to hold onto the past
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.1217 -
This quoted post has been removed.
The evidence that the COVID vaccines are beneficial for mothers and baby’s does not require being an expert to understand. See my previous post if you’re interested in the facts.
1115 -
The percentage of infants hospitalized with COVID-19 whose mothers had been vaccinated during pregnancy decreased from 18% during October 2022–September 2023 to less than 5% during October 2023–April 2024. Nine infants died in the hospital; all were born to mothers with no record of vaccination during pregnancy.Infants less than 6 months of age have among the highest rates of hospitalization with COVID-19 compared to other age groups. Infants with COVID-19 frequently have severe illness with approximately 1 in 5 admitted to the intensive care unit and almost 1 in 20 requiring mechanical ventilation.
Hard to frame this decision any other way than intentionally harming infants.
1210 -
Harambe wrote:
The percentage of infants hospitalized with COVID-19 whose mothers had been vaccinated during pregnancy decreased from 18% during October 2022–September 2023 to less than 5% during October 2023–April 2024. Nine infants died in the hospital; all were born to mothers with no record of vaccination during pregnancy.Infants less than 6 months of age have among the highest rates of hospitalization with COVID-19 compared to other age groups. Infants with COVID-19 frequently have severe illness with approximately 1 in 5 admitted to the intensive care unit and almost 1 in 20 requiring mechanical ventilation.Hard to frame this decision any other way than intentionally harming infants.
You’re upset. Why so?
414 -
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
The big psychological hurdle that most people can't get over is the correct answer to the following question - Did TRUMP really ignore all negative health consequences of the Covid vaccines and Remdesivir just so him and his buddies could make billions of dollars?
The correct answer puts TRUMP on par with the biggest war criminals of the last hundred years.
Obama banned Gain-of-Function Research (engineered virus tampering). In 2017, Trump lifted that ban. Now Trump gets Army engineered COVID to release somewhere in the world to taking (or over a foreign region much easier.
.
COVID is 100% the Trump Plague. All he had to do was get some of the Army's engineered COVID (modified from Wuhan samples obtained from the University of North Carolina, which paid the Wuhan lab to send them samples). . . . Trump prefers to punch back harder when he loses a self-inflicted Trade war.
. . .
The U.S. Army's Biological "Defense" Center at Fort Detrick (formerly the Biological Warfare center) hired the University of North Carolina's, Ralph Baric to collect COVID samples for the Army to play around with. Baric was given a top secret clearance.
.
The world's foremost expert on coronaviruses, [Ralph] Baric and his collaborators [at UNC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill] helped roll out the first FDA-approved COVID-19 treatment, the existing antiviral Remdesivir, then helped develop another, Molnupiravir. Then Baric helped develop and test the Moderna vaccine.
.
In one sample of bat guano, Shi [@ Wuhan Lab] had detected the genome of a new virus, called SHC014, that was one of the two closest relatives to the original SARS virus, but her team had not been able to culture it in the lab. ... Baric had developed a way around that problem—a technique for “reverse genetics” in coronaviruses. Not only did it allow him to bring an actual virus to life from its genetic code, but he could mix and match parts of multiple viruses. He wanted to take the “spike” gene from SHC014 and move it into a genetic copy of the SARS virus he already had in his lab. The spike molecule is what lets a coronavirus open a cell and get inside it. ... Baric asked Shi if he could have the genetic data for SHC014. “She was gracious enough to send us those sequences almost immediately,” he says. His team introduced the virus modified with that code into mice and into a petri dish of human airway cells. Sure enough, the chimera exhibited “robust replication” in the human cells—evidence that nature was full of coronaviruses ready to leap directly to people.
Robert Redfield said. “I think there is a real possibility that the virus’s birthplace was Chapel Hill [UNC].” Redfield, the [former] CDC director under ... Donald Trump, had originally supported the idea that the virus came from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
.
2009: As soon as he had the bat virus with the SARS-like RBD, Baric started experimenting with it in mice, which are susceptible to the same RBD as humans. Baric will soon publish data on a vaccine platform that prevents some SARS-like viruses from infecting mice, including elderly mice, who, like elderly humans, are the population most likely to die of SARS. ... That’s not enough for Baric, who is studying more bat coronaviruses to try to improve the vaccine’s range. His team wants to build a vaccine platform that offers the flexibility of modern flu vaccines, which are genetically altered each year to fight current virus strains. “We want to be able to respond quickly next time any of these viruses reemerge,” he says.
.
-
-
-
-
- from 2009:79 -
This quoted post has been removed.
Look in the mirror, troll.
54 -
Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
The big psychological hurdle that most people can't get over is the correct answer to the following question - Did TRUMP really ignore all negative health consequences of the Covid vaccines and Remdesivir just so him and his buddies could make billions of dollars?
The correct answer puts TRUMP on par with the biggest war criminals of the last hundred years.
Exactly. Especially considering the virus was likely made and released from the A SAMPLE SENT TO U.S. ARMY'S BIOWEAPONS LAB AT FORT DETRICK BY RALPH BARIC. Time for Trump THE con artist TO investigating himself and finding no wrong doing as usual.
Try to keep up. Trump already did that when he told the world before anyone knew that COVID was culprit, "COVID is the flu and will be gone in two weeks."
57
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.