10 beers vs. 10 miles - which can be done faster?

You're dumb. Ten beers in fifty minutes is nothing...

WoW...

Come on man - if it was a good brew (a nice india pale ale or something) then yeah maybe bet on the runner. But if it's some crappy american bilge water like bud or coors then no way: an alcoholic would have no problem drinking 10 twelve ounce cans of that crap in 40 minutes. Especially if he's fat.

I'll give credit to he who runs 10 miles soon after drinking 10 beers.

I bet I could f*** 10 chicks faster than I could drink 10 beers.....or run 10 miles for that matter. As long as up the ass counts. And you have to spooge each time before you move on to the next chick.

The beer-drinker would die long b4 the 10-miler was done.

how about this? wrote:

I bet I could f*** 10 chicks faster than I could drink 10 beers......

wow

Is he allowed to funnel the beers? If so he should be able to polish them off first.

i've done 2 40s of Steel Reserve in a hair under 19 minutes. Thats about 12 beers. I've seen it done faster.

10 miles while drinking 10 beers would be a whole other story.

duh wrote:

i've done 2 40s of Steel Reserve in a hair under 19 minutes. Thats about 12 beers. I've seen it done faster.

10 miles while drinking 10 beers would be a whole other story.

duh wrote:

i've done 2 40s of Steel Reserve in a hair under 19 minutes. Thats about 12 beers. I've seen it done faster.

10 miles while drinking 10 beers would be a whole other story.

let me do some quick math for you

this guy has to drink 10 cans X 12 oz. = 120 oz

you drink 2 bottles X 40 oz. = 80 oz.

it's not about the alcohol it's about the volume in the stomache

so if you can drink that 3rd 40 oz in the next 35 min you'll be good

I completely disagree, its entirely about the alcohol content.

By your reasoning then, 10 shots of grain alcohol would be infinitely easier. Please.

Or another example, thats why the beer mile is hard. Its not about the freaking amount of liquid in your stomach. Do a mile using 4 cans of beer, then do a mile using the same amount of water.

I don't think I have to tell you which will be run faster.

duh wrote:

Or another example, thats why the beer mile is hard. Its not about the freaking amount of liquid in your stomach. Do a mile using 4 cans of beer, then do a mile using the same amount of water.

I don't think I have to tell you which will be run faster.

Then what does make the beer mile hard? I really think I would be able to run a mile faster with 4 beers than 4 Coca-Colas.

Im saying its the alcohol content, not the volume of liquid, which determines the speed.

If you had to drink 12 ounces of water per lap of a mile vs. 12 ounces of beer per lap of a mile, you honestly don't think the water mile would be run MUCH faster?

either way, the original post was about 10 miles vs 10 beers. The 10 beer alcoholic should be able to destroy the 10 miler.

The beer don't hit you until after you are done with the beer mile.

duh wrote:

Im saying its the alcohol content, not the volume of liquid, which determines the speed.

If you had to drink 12 ounces of water per lap of a mile vs. 12 ounces of beer per lap of a mile, you honestly don't think the water mile would be run MUCH faster?

either way, the original post was about 10 miles vs 10 beers. The 10 beer alcoholic should be able to destroy the 10 miler.

It's the carbonated liquid coming out of a can that makes the Beer Mile hard. You're not the brightest bulb on the tree are you.

There's a big difference betweeen drinking 2-40's in 20 minutes & 3 in 50. Think of it like the marathon. You can make it to 20 miles feeling fine & then bam, you hit the wall.

again, im gonna disagree. we can argue this back and forth all day. like everything on letsrun, it always comes down to insults to get a point across.

i could do a mile with pepsi faster than i could do a mile with an equal amount of beer. much faster.

Yes your right this duh guy is an idiot.

"you're"

duh