Obviously Asinga was higher profile and tested positive in 2023, but rumor's are going around that Skyler Franklin has tested positive as well (17 years old).
I don't believe these are entirely coincidental (e.g. both individually decided to dope) or tainted supplements. It's a sports focused school where both made massive drops so who's supplying drugs?
Obviously Asinga was higher profile and tested positive in 2023, but rumor's are going around that Skyler Franklin has tested positive as well (17 years old).
I don't believe these are entirely coincidental (e.g. both individually decided to dope) or tainted supplements. It's a sports focused school where both made massive drops so who's supplying drugs?
My thinking since Assinga testes positive is that him testing positive isn't the real story. There has to be some sort of backing for him to get access to the drug he tested positive for. The drug was canceled years ago for causing cancer. I really doubt it's in any supplements because why would it be anywhere? It's not the kinda thing that would sloppily end up contaminating another product. Some adult helped Assinga get the drug/doped assinga without his knowledge. This needs to be looked into, and the program needs to be investigated. I don't know if the team or coaches had some sort of doping culture, but it obviously can't be ruled out, and is far more plausible than assinga's theory.
I worked with a guy who got arrested and 9 months jail for selling drugs to high school kids. He maintained his job the whole time, but I'm not sure if he told the HR department the lie he told others that he was helping his family out of trouble and couldn't work as the excuse to why he missed 9 months. I only found out because my friends dad was on the police force.
Explain to me why it should be considered wrong for a guy who is training to be a fast sprinter takes a supplement that makes him able to train better to be a fast sprinter. I don’t think the anti-doping crowd has considered why they even hold their opinions anymore.
Explain to me why it should be considered wrong for a guy who is training to be a fast sprinter takes a supplement that makes him able to train better to be a fast sprinter. I don’t think the anti-doping crowd has considered why they even hold their opinions anymore.
I don't think Assinga's positive had anything to do with supplements, it's obviously a BS excuse.
Explain to me why it should be considered wrong for a guy who is training to be a fast sprinter takes a supplement that makes him able to train better to be a fast sprinter. I don’t think the anti-doping crowd has considered why they even hold their opinions anymore.
This is your second moronic take of the day. It’s as bad as “if you have a beard but identify as female on a day, you should be able to compete as a woman”
And they will explain their sentiment in.court...theygo too far with strings on this thread...So...They Will get subpoenas when the ip addresses are downloaded..m
I'm.happy you are being hypothetical and not stating it as face...your trolling is now being free speech.. and it's pointing to defamation....and is justiciable in the courts of law
Explain to me why it should be considered wrong for a guy who is training to be a fast sprinter takes a supplement that makes him able to train better to be a fast sprinter. I don’t think the anti-doping crowd has considered why they even hold their opinions anymore.
Am assumin that there national records will be taken down and the coaching staff will be fired right?
......RIGHT?
And for the stupid fool talking about defamation, I think you mean getting counter sued by Gatorade for public defamation for acting like they sprinkle GW1516 on recovery gummies.
If you learn anything from Charlie Francis, you take it like a MAN! Don't deflect. Keep your mouth SHUT and own up to it when the house of cards crumbles!
Explain to me why it should be considered wrong for a guy who is training to be a fast sprinter takes a supplement that makes him able to train better to be a fast sprinter. I don’t think the anti-doping crowd has considered why they even hold their opinions anymore.
This is your second moronic take of the day. It’s as bad as “if you have a beard but identify as female on a day, you should be able to compete as a woman”
I can’t imagine being stupid enough to fall for such obvious bait, “Wokeism”