that is a male
that is a male
I'm sure there are thousands. They don't relate whatsoever.
I'm pretty close. I can just barely crack 60 in the 4 and my PR is 58:15 for 10. In all honesty though I only ever do 400's in workouts. I only ran one open 400 in hs (when I broke 60) and I had already run a couple of other events.
There are plenty, I'm sure. I am among them:
400-meter PR: 63
10-mile PR: 56:41
There's a good chance I'd fall into that category, but I don't know. I haven't run an all out 400M in a long time. I would guess a lot of people haven't.
add me to the list.
Never had much speed.
PRs as of right now I know it's not above 60 but I ran a low 59 and I have ran 52:04 for 10 miles so far
While I expect I maybe could run 400 under 60 if I trained for it and tried, I've never actually done it. Fastest lap I've ever run has been about 64s (during a 1500). Fastest 200 has been about 29s (in training). I've run 10 miles in the mid-56 range.
WR 400 is 43:18 seconds
WR 10-miles is 44 minutes and change
So there is a similar "correlation"
Last time I broke was :60 was in 1992, it is now 2006 and most recent PB's are 24:50 8k, 31:46 10k and 1:09:37 1/2 marathon. You do not need speed to run 5:00 miles.
Yea, nearly all the guys on my track team!
why and why not why and why no wrote:
WR 400 is 43:18 seconds
WR 10-miles is 44 minutes and change
So there is a similar "correlation"
That is totally irrevelant...
It's not like Michael Johnson could run his 43.18 and also run 44 minutes for 10 miles, they are two very different times with very different training regimens, which is why the correlation really doesn't exist at all.
I could barely break 60 for 400, maybe 57 or so.
Best 10 mile was 51:29 (in a 1/2 marathon).
If I guy who can only run say 65 for 400 puts in high mileage he should easily break 60:00 for ten.
I think that was a joke.
um running 60sec 400m is way different than running 90sec per 400m for 10miles.
Never ran track in high school or college, but tried to run some hard 400's in workouts just to see...
400m pr = 64
10 mile pr = 59:10
Never ran 200's in training but pretty sure if I had tried I wouldn't have been able to break 31. Sad but true.
Can barely break 60 (run 59 years ago) but 49:54. As Ingrid Kristiansen said, it's not a speed problem that distance runners have, it's an endurance problem.
A number of women who can go under 60 for ten miles but can not do 60 or under for the 400. This I would think would mostly happen to women.
There was a guy on my college XC and track team ... if he broke 60, it wasn't by much, but he ran sub 30:00 for 10K on the track. The really odd thing about him was that his 3K, 5K and 10K paces were not all that different and when he set his 10K PR, he ran a 5K PR in the last half.
... he also played darts better the more he drank.