Would it be comical by then? The shoes/trampolines might be 30 inches long.
Would it be comical by then? The shoes/trampolines might be 30 inches long.
Barbie Bur wrote:
Would it be comical by then? The shoes/trampolines might be 30 inches long.
Wow. Them new shoes are going to make the women run down the men.
Barbie Bur wrote:
What happens in 5 years when the latest Super Shoes have women running 13:20 and men running sub-13?
This is going to shock you. But men are ALREADY running sub 13.
Men have been running sub 13 for decades.
ripvanwink wrote:
Men have been running sub 13 for decades.
I meant sub-12
Genders in sport will be rendered obsolete.
Barbie Bur wrote:
ripvanwink wrote:
Men have been running sub 13 for decades.
I meant sub-12
Then the answer is you will continue to post wrong sports info all the time and you’ll still be making lame threads bashing women’s basketball.
Of the all time 800 list, 19/20 were run in regular shoes.
Of the all time 1500m list, 14/20 were run in regular shoes.
Of the all time 5000m list, 22/35 were run in regular shoes.
So to recap, post super shoes.. we’ve had one person break into the top 20 in the 800 in the past 6 years. We’ve had 6 people break into the top 20 of the 1500m in the past 6 years. And we’ve had 13 people break into the top 35 of the 5k.
So most likely, in 5 years… there will be more entrants to the top list just a their typically is when 5 years passes. The number of entrants on all time list has not accelerated.
Thanks for playing.
ripvanwink wrote:
Barbie Bur wrote:
I meant sub-12
Then the answer is you will continue to post wrong sports info all the time and you’ll still be making lame threads bashing women’s basketball.
This PERFECTLY describes Sally.
Barbie Bur wrote:
ripvanwink wrote:
Men have been running sub 13 for decades.
I meant sub-12
imagine trying to make a sarcastic post and then get the most important thing wrong 🤦🏻
Barbie Bur wrote:
ripvanwink wrote:
Men have been running sub 13 for decades.
I meant sub-12
If you had even bothered to glance at your thread title, that “13:00” should have reached out and slapped you in the face.
4:20 is not that fast wrote:
Barbie Bur wrote:
I meant sub-12
If you had even bothered to glance at your thread title, that “13:00” should have reached out and slapped you in the face.
Hope you are not advocating violence.
Every technology has diminishing returns. Eventually the gains will be incremental, so I don't expect to see a never-ending improvement in times due to shoe tech.
EvilRunner wrote:
Barbie Bur wrote:
I meant sub-12
imagine trying to make a sarcastic post and then get the most important thing wrong 🤦🏻
That’s par for the course for the OP.
ripvanwink wrote:
EvilRunner wrote:
imagine trying to make a sarcastic post and then get the most important thing wrong 🤦🏻
That’s par for the course for the OP.
Well excussseee me. I made a minor gafe. You never messed up?
Barbie Burr wrote:
ripvanwink wrote:
That’s par for the course for the OP.
Well excussseee me. I made a minor gafe. You never messed up?
Dude you do it all the time.
Barbie Bur wrote:
ripvanwink wrote:
Men have been running sub 13 for decades.
I meant sub-12
That’s too bad, guess you should have typed that in your original post you absolute joke of a human.