The anti-Jew crowd is literally supporting Hamas which literally raped and executed people.
Why are you more offended by my noticing what these people defend than you are by them defending it let alone by the actions themselves.
Why are you literally presuming my beliefs vs just realizing that posts like the one I responded to are why you occasionally get put in the naughty zone by moderators?
The anti-Jew crowd is literally supporting Hamas which literally raped and executed people.
Why are you more offended by my noticing what these people defend than you are by them defending it let alone by the actions themselves.
Why are you literally presuming my beliefs vs just realizing that posts like the one I responded to are why you occasionally get put in the naughty zone by moderators?
Do you believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza?
Do you routinely rush to the defense of people you don't agree with?
Why are you literally presuming my beliefs vs just realizing that posts like the one I responded to are why you occasionally get put in the naughty zone by moderators?
Do you believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza?
Do you routinely rush to the defense of people you don't agree with?
Genocide? No.
Why do you believe I “routinely rush to the defense of people I don’t agree with”?
Why do you believe I “routinely rush to the defense of people I don’t agree with”?
Because your first post was in defense of an openly pro-Hamas poster.
Where did I defend an openly pro-Hamas poster? I said that you shouldn’t be surprised that you catch bans when YOU post things like “If only he simply went to the nearest black neighborhood and raped and executed some Jews you'd be defending him.” Conflating that to defending a pro-Hamas poster is showing a lack of comprehension on your part.
Because your first post was in defense of an openly pro-Hamas poster.
Where did I defend an openly pro-Hamas poster? I said that you shouldn’t be surprised that you catch bans when YOU post things like “If only he simply went to the nearest black neighborhood and raped and executed some Jews you'd be defending him.” Conflating that to defending a pro-Hamas poster is showing a lack of comprehension on your part.
Newname has been banned 50 times for anti-semitism. When his head pops off the pillow in the morning the first thing he does is curse the Jews. It's a little absurd for him to be offended by 1 idiot being a racist while he's literally supporting a bigoted terrorist group.
Your first post was an attack on me to defend an openly pro-Hamas poster.
These are two separate issues. Try to use your amazing comprehension skills and keep up.
Where did I defend an openly pro-Hamas poster? I said that you shouldn’t be surprised that you catch bans when YOU post things like “If only he simply went to the nearest black neighborhood and raped and executed some Jews you'd be defending him.” Conflating that to defending a pro-Hamas poster is showing a lack of comprehension on your part.
Newname has been banned 50 times for anti-semitism. When his head pops off the pillow in the morning the first thing he does is curse the Jews. It's a little absurd for him to be offended by 1 idiot being a racist while he's literally supporting a bigoted terrorist group.
Your first post was an attack on me to defend an openly pro-Hamas poster.
These are two separate issues. Try to use your amazing comprehension skills and keep up.
Again, you are claiming I defended him by pointing out that YOUR post is why you catch band.
Newname has been banned 50 times for anti-semitism. When his head pops off the pillow in the morning the first thing he does is curse the Jews. It's a little absurd for him to be offended by 1 idiot being a racist while he's literally supporting a bigoted terrorist group.
Your first post was an attack on me to defend an openly pro-Hamas poster.
These are two separate issues. Try to use your amazing comprehension skills and keep up.
Again, you are claiming I defended him by pointing out that YOUR post is why you catch band.
You don't even seem to comprehend what your first post to me was...
How did I defend him? The same way I “defended” newname?
Are you on the spectrum? Are you trolling?
I could ask you the same. You seem to struggle with the concept that taking issue with something YOU say is not predicated on defense of whoever you responded to when you say something ridiculous.
Are you honest/clever enough to admit what your implication is?
Are you honest/clever enough to understand why I might assume you disagreed with me?
Are you honest/clever enough to understand why I might assume you agreed with the position of the person I was responding to?
The irony is that YOU would say that someone doesn’t understand what is happening and is just rooting for their team. The irony is that you’re saying that, given your posting history, which has absolutely zero to do with mussibini. Follow yet?
Killing tens of thousands of kids vie mass bombings and starvation and denial of medical treatment is not a war.
Destroying nearly every hospital, school, and home is Gaza is not war.
Finding mass graves with hundreds of bodies, many with hands handcuffed behind them, is not war.
Genocide. War Crimes. Crimes against humanity. Yes
War? No
By your logic then, dropping "the bomb" on Japan twice in August 1945 would be classified as a war crime since it killed many children and other non-combatants as well as destroying schools and hospitals.
Killing tens of thousands of kids vie mass bombings and starvation and denial of medical treatment is not a war.
Destroying nearly every hospital, school, and home is Gaza is not war.
Finding mass graves with hundreds of bodies, many with hands handcuffed behind them, is not war.
Genocide. War Crimes. Crimes against humanity. Yes
War? No
By your logic then, dropping "the bomb" on Japan twice in August 1945 would be classified as a war crime since it killed many children and other non-combatants as well as destroying schools and hospitals.
Of course that's his position. He's said so many times. Wait till tomorrow morning when he comes back on here and starts calling Hiroshima a war crime. The bombs probably saved two million Japanese lives that would have been lost in a conventional invasion. But if you tell him that he'll refute it. He's a classic troll.
Are you honest/clever enough to admit what your implication is?
Are you honest/clever enough to understand why I might assume you disagreed with me?
Are you honest/clever enough to understand why I might assume you agreed with the position of the person I was responding to?
The irony is that YOU would say that someone doesn’t understand what is happening and is just rooting for their team. The irony is that you’re saying that, given your posting history, which has absolutely zero to do with mussibini. Follow yet?
I know what's happening. I've actually looked into the topics I comment on. People like mussibini just run with whatever their cult tells them to think. If you think these people have any idea what's actually happened or is happening in Ukraine or Israel you're completely delusional.
Killing tens of thousands of kids vie mass bombings and starvation and denial of medical treatment is not a war.
Destroying nearly every hospital, school, and home is Gaza is not war.
Finding mass graves with hundreds of bodies, many with hands handcuffed behind them, is not war.
Genocide. War Crimes. Crimes against humanity. Yes
War? No
By your logic then, dropping "the bomb" on Japan twice in August 1945 would be classified as a war crime since it killed many children and other non-combatants as well as destroying schools and hospitals.
Of course it was a war crime. Dropping atomic bombs on cities! Unthinkably evil
By your logic then, dropping "the bomb" on Japan twice in August 1945 would be classified as a war crime since it killed many children and other non-combatants as well as destroying schools and hospitals.
Of course that's his position. He's said so many times. Wait till tomorrow morning when he comes back on here and starts calling Hiroshima a war crime. The bombs probably saved two million Japanese lives that would have been lost in a conventional invasion. But if you tell him that he'll refute it. He's a classic troll.
WE know how many people the bombs killed.
Japan was ready to surrender so stow that saved 2 million lives propaganda.
The 2nd bomb was hurriedly dropped (US only had 2) within 3 days of the first before Japan could surrender
Why do those who buy the nuking Japanese people saved lives propaganda suppose the 2ns bomb was dropped so quickly after the first before the Japanese even had a chance to surrender?