bravo for this exercise in illogic. there being a climate problem is not necessarily connected to the market caring to do a thing about it. you in fact underline that market actors may have incentives contrary to fixing climate. hertz is neither a charity nor an environmentally-oriented business.
there are other businesses like amazon trying something else but if you drive past an amazon hub, it's charging stations as far as the eye can see, and with a set delivery day scheduled up, they can plan within range to have the trucks circle back home. then charge overnight. someone on vacation wants more freedom to drive, to improvise, and needs abundant charging that does it faster. if hertz was thinking it could maybe steer customers on work trips with commutes and overnight charging stations -- as well as enviros -- to the EVs, then let tourists burn gas. until the infrastructure is there.
if i wanted to get real punchy the US has entrenched interests behind oil and gas, and will not change until the planet is on fire. by that time trying to switch to EVs will not mean much as heat will be locked in for centuries.
you folks mock or even legislate against ESGs but it's businesses playing the long term game as opposed to looking next quarter. even worse than the pandemic, climate gets out of hand and it will decimate business as we know it. to me its survival instinct. but we resist survival instinct these days. abbott in texas doubled down on LNG-power after LNG plants froze in the winter storm. he tried to incentivize reopening old LNG plants to add capacity. no one took him up on it as they want to prop up expensive electricity not dilute their own price with more capacity. so we have added no capacity and are about to have another hard freeze.
we no longer respond to reality with common sense.