Check out her IG post where she’s giving the finger. Yet she fails to understand the SCOTUS ruling. Typical of someone like her striving to remain relevant.
Her statement is so illogical it’s obvious she has no clue what the court ruling was about. If she has any decent sponsorships left they should exercise their morals clause. She’s trash for doing this as likely there are impressionable young girls that look up to her.
And don’t think I’m in the wrong nor the minority here; just read the comments on her IG page.
Yes…and obviously better educated, more knowledgable about the facts of the case than her, and certainly more intelligent. And more well-known worldwide in the professional running community than her.
Soon Molly will enter law school, provide an immediate spunky voice on the law review and be fast tracked to judge shortly theteafter. That's what can happen to family members of past judges.
Her statement is so illogical it’s obvious she has no clue what the court ruling was about. If she has any decent sponsorships left they should exercise their morals clause. She’s trash for doing this as likely there are impressionable young girls that look up to her.
And don’t think I’m in the wrong nor the minority here; just read the comments on her IG page.
She’s the running community’s Tanya Harding.
Nothing scares sheep like you more than being in the minority, huh? Pathetic.
Yes…and obviously better educated, more knowledgable about the facts of the case than her, and certainly more intelligent. And more well-known worldwide in the professional running community than her.
The smartest people in a room don't typically describe themselves in a manner like this, or call themselves smarter than everyone else. You and molly are just opposites lmao. She may or may not know what she's talking about but who cares. She's expressing discontentment with a ruling that has already happened so she's not actually hurting anyone. All you're doing is being hateful over a runners political opinions, who gives a crap dude? We get it, you're conservative, she's not. Move on snowflake, you're feelings are hurt too easily
This post was edited 43 seconds after it was posted.
Yes…and obviously better educated, more knowledgable about the facts of the case than her, and certainly more intelligent. And more well-known worldwide in the professional running community than her.
More knowledge? Big ego? Better known worldwide?
Thank you former U.S. Senator James Ryun for checking in.
Some on here say you were a secret 44.xx 400m man. It's a shame we never saw you race Ralph Doubell, indoor 600yd dash.
So you are more socially conservative than Molly Seidel, is that your point?
Have a good night.
Is it socially conservative to think that slavery (i.e. forcing others to work for you without their consent) is bad?
This is not a thoughtful argument. Everyone agrees that if you own a business, you can’t deny service to a person based on their race, whether you “consent” or not.
Check out her IG post where she’s giving the finger. Yet she fails to understand the SCOTUS ruling. Typical of someone like her striving to remain relevant.
Someone should reach out to Molly's favorite LGBTXYZ website design company and demand they make a site that says Jesus is King and marriage is between one man and woman, everyone else sins. See if they happily do it.
Her statement is so illogical it’s obvious she has no clue what the court ruling was about. If she has any decent sponsorships left they should exercise their morals clause. She’s trash for doing this as likely there are impressionable young girls that look up to her.
And don’t think I’m in the wrong nor the minority here; just read the comments on her IG page.
She’s the running community’s Tanya Harding.
So, on one hand you are celebrating a decision that is hailed as a victory for the First Amendment, while calling on her sponsors to cancel her for exercising her First Amendment right?
Everyone has an opinion on everything. Athletes, celebrities, everyday people. Reacting negatively to every opinion that someone has that disagrees with mine, wouldn't be productive or beneficial. Doing so equals giving them control of your mood and happiness.