Looking at some photos of track runners from the 1980s and just from a while ago, they appear to be much stronger and bigger than the average track runner we see today. Is this true and does anyone know why?
Looking at some photos of track runners from the 1980s and just from a while ago, they appear to be much stronger and bigger than the average track runner we see today. Is this true and does anyone know why?
less wokeness. men weren't afraid to be big . muscly oily sexy men back then. nowadays the woke liberal mob is forcing feminization on all men making us weak and small. blame it on Joe Byron.
Legend has it Seb Coe was 6'6 and 200 pounds, when he ran his 800m world record every step he took left a dent in the track.
With hot trends like American Gladiators, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Metallica, WWF wrestling and TV shows like Alf, it is no surprise 1980s guys made the Craig Mottram's of the running world look puny.
This includes Mottram's balls.
Whereas today's runners are like Steve Erkel.
wokealert wrote:
less wokeness. men weren't afraid to be big . muscly oily sexy men back then. nowadays the woke liberal mob is forcing feminization on all men making us weak and small. blame it on Joe Byron.
yeah, those tiny kenyans are so woke