Stanford was once one of the world’s great universities. It birthed Silicon Valley in its prime. And along with its nearby twin and rival, UC Berkeley, its brilliant researchers…
"Three, they were arrogant. One protestor blurted out that Justice Duncan probably could not have gotten into Stanford, as if their own puerile performance was proof of the school’s high standards of admission. That was obnoxious in addition to the fact that, as of recently, it may have become not so true. In July 2022, Stanford Law School announced that an uncharacteristic 14 percent of its graduates had flunked the California bar exam on their first attempt, a radical increase from past years. Four other California law schools—UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC Irvine, and USC—had a higher bar pass rate."
The article went into great lengths about the shout down of Judge Duncan. It appears that the law school has a radical, unstable element. If a law school can't calmly discuss different points of view, it has problems. The National Lawyers Guild, a sketchy alternative to the ABA, encouraged the protest.
But Stanford is doing something about it
Stanford has promised to discipline the students involved and there is the threat of reporting the students to the California Bar. The Dean issued a blistering letter to the students outlining their lack understanding of free speech.
I thought Stanford's response was encouraging.
This post was edited 48 seconds after it was posted.
Rice University is calling the need for 1/3 of its admissions to be minorities from “underserved” communities, a matter of national security, which is ironic in considering the former President of the school flooded the campus with Chinese students. I think it’s safe to say that democrats are the threat to national security.
A Texas university released a statement defending the school's diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives as "a matter of national security" and a part of its "foundational values," Fox News Digital reported.Ahead of the Su...
Rice University is calling the need for 1/3 of its admissions to be minorities from “underserved” communities, a matter of national security, which is ironic in considering the former President of the school flooded the campus with Chinese students. I think it’s safe to say that democrats are the threat to national security.
Rice University is calling the need for 1/3 of its admissions to be minorities from “underserved” communities, a matter of national security, which is ironic in considering the former President of the school flooded the campus with Chinese students. I think it’s safe to say that democrats are the threat to national security.
How is making education available to underserved communities a national security threat? Those people already live here.
I'd consider left wing radicals in positions of influence... Advancement to "top" universities, government, corporate roles, etc. to be a more of an existential threat than anything else. Look at what they did with COVID, imagine how they'd manage a more lethal pathogen or if an asteroid was on a collision course with Earth. In communist countries, they've been responsible for millions upon millions of murders, starvation, corruption, and so much more. The saddest part is as long as humans exist, radical left wing people will as well :(
Am I supposed to be insulted? I'm not a political person and certainly not a right wing Fox News guy, I just hate left wingers. As a non political person, do I want to live in Castro's Cuba or Stalin's USSR? Or Pinochet's Chile or Franco's Spain? Easy choice. I'll take having food, thank you very much.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.