It can not be argued at this point that the BU track is faster than any other track in the country due to the wood substructure and asymmetrical banking. Therefore, for NCAA qualifying purposes, how is it fair to teams that never have a chance to run on the BU track? The top guys in the country will make it in regardless to nationals, but to the guys on the bubble not going to BU could be the difference maker.
It can not be argued at this point that the BU track is faster than any other track in the country due to the wood substructure and asymmetrical banking. Therefore, for NCAA qualifying purposes, how is it fair to teams that never have a chance to run on the BU track? The top guys in the country will make it in regardless to nationals, but to the guys on the bubble not going to BU could be the difference maker.
discus
BU track hasn't gotten overrated jesus christ. Is it fair that teams at altitude can use the NCAAs absurdly generous altitude calculator to qualify for NCAAs? Washington put 5 guys 3:53 or under at UW, BU isn't some magic track. You can run fast elsewhere around the country.
It can not be argued at this point that the BU track is faster than any other track in the country due to the wood substructure and asymmetrical banking. Therefore, for NCAA qualifying purposes, how is it fair to teams that never have a chance to run on the BU track? The top guys in the country will make it in regardless to nationals, but to the guys on the bubble not going to BU could be the difference maker.
discus
BU track hasn't gotten overrated jesus christ. Is it fair that teams at altitude can use the NCAAs absurdly generous altitude calculator to qualify for NCAAs? Washington put 5 guys 3:53 or under at UW, BU isn't some magic track. You can run fast elsewhere around the country.
BU track offsets west coast advantage during outdoor track