I prefer time. I like knowing how long my run will be before I start no matter how I'm feeling. 10 miles when you're sore or a hilly route is much harder than going out for 60 min.
I prefer time. I like knowing how long my run will be before I start no matter how I'm feeling. 10 miles when you're sore or a hilly route is much harder than going out for 60 min.
Ehh...
Races are set by distance. Humans have a poor intuitive sense of regulating effort over time but can instinctively govern their pace when told to race from the tall tree to the creek.
Train by distance. Adjust your pace to the conditions. Keep your mileage somewhere between 85-90 percent of what you think you could handle for that given week and you will have a good chance of long term success.
I prefer time. I like knowing how long my run will be before I start no matter how I'm feeling. 10 miles when you're sore or a hilly route is much harder than going out for 60 min.
Ehh...
Races are set by distance. Humans have a poor intuitive sense of regulating effort over time but can instinctively govern their pace when told to race from the tall tree to the creek.
Train by distance. Adjust your pace to the conditions. Keep your mileage somewhere between 85-90 percent of what you think you could handle for that given week and you will have a good chance of long term success.
I agree. Running for time is a bad way to train. If you're looking at schools that do this, run the other way.
Time for easy runs, I’m often tempted to speed up to get the run over with faster.
Distance for track work/tempo runs/reps to hit target splits and better gauge progress
This is wise. I would also include long runs as a specific distance and not time. Especially if you’re training for a half, thon, or longer. You’ll easier cover the duration in timed runs for 5-10k training but not necessarily for the longer distances.