No, they are not trumpeted any more than one would expect large and often deliberate civilian killings in an invasion by an enemy of the West would be reported in MSM. I think your bias is that you just don't like being reminded Ukrainian civilians are dying by the thousands. It's important and significant news of a major world event.
No, they are not. We are all aware, via Western media reports, of the magnitude of the Ukrainian civilians and troops being killed by Russians. I gave you some examples. They are easy to find and reported often. No one disputes that the Russians are killing Ukrainians by the tens of thousands.
Untrue. You're misapprehension is that you believe the atrocities must be occurring in equal amounts on either side, hence more reports about Russian war crimes and atrocities can only be attributable to biased media reporting. That type of fallacy -- that a disparity can only be caused by an unfair bias -- is often used by Woke-types in the US regarding racial issues. There are more war crimes and atrocities by Russian soldiers being reported, because they are committing more war crimes and atrocities again Ukrainian civilians than Ukrainians are committing against Russian civilians.
True. I thought you wanted factual reporting without bias?
Untrue. Endless MSM stories about NATO weapons being provided to Ukraine and used by Ukrainians, and how important they are to the Ukraine effort. Zelenskyy says as much all the time, and that gets reported too.
Ukrainians are, by the way, putting up a heroic effort against a disgusting and murderous invading force. They seem willing to risk their lives and die by the thousands for the sovereignty of their country and desire not to be ruled and occupied (and killed) by invaders.
I haven't seen much of this at all. The Moskva did sink, but people waited until it was confirmed by multiple sources with facts, before it was celebrated. Same with all other events showcasing extreme Russian incompetence -- e.g., cowardly retreat from Kyiv, incompetent attempts by Russian to cross the Siverskyi Donets River.
Cheap comment. I gave you linked examples that defeated your claim (and prefaced the post with the fact that I was giving examples). Obviously, I can't post a comprehensive list, which would involve tens of thousands of links and many days of research. But it's all easy to find. You can do it. I think you even tried to, when you found the MSM powerhouse Time article.
This started when you jumped in supporting carmine9's endless post that anything he doesn't like to read must by some wild, conspiratorial lie by the mainstream media propaganda machine. Nobody denies that the mainstream media is not biased about some things, some of the time. Yet, it is not difficult to determine, reading between the lines (sorting the wheat from the chaff, as you say), that Russia's invasion of Ukraine is a bogus endeavor, a colossal failure that no one expected, run by incompetent leaders with incompetent soldiers, the Moskva is sunk, Russian generals are dead, Russian tanks blow up, and this Russian invasion has destroyed the lives of millions of innocent Ukrainians. I think you could even determine all that from Russian media, if you knew how to sort wheat from chaff.