From fellow Princetonian Eric Wills' piece on Nick Willis in GQ.
Eric Wills wrote:
Before his bronze medal at the Rio Olympics in 2016, Willis conducted yet another experiment, this time with weight-cutting. “I really restricted my calorie intake in the two months before Rio,” he said, “but I also really upped my weightlifting intensity. My theory was it didn’t matter if my weight dropped, so long as I was increasing my power in the weight room.” As soon as his lifting dropped off, he consumed more calories, attempting to find the perfect equilibrium. He trained at 156 pounds leading up to the Games; for the final, he was down to 146. Two weeks later, he was back to 155. (Eating disorders are common in the sport, and Willis cautions that his window of weight reduction was narrow.) With his frame, Willis said, getting too lean can lead to injury. “He’s a candy and cookie guy,” said Warhurst. “He’s always running around stealing cookies and candy from people. He gains 10 pounds like that.”
I'm confused by Willis' quote when he says, "My theory was it didn't matter if my weight dropped...."
Isn't the whole point of restricting your diet to lose weight?
What does he mean by that? Is he implying when you don't eat much you also normally lose energy but his theory is you don't lose energy if you lift? I really don't totally understand that quote.