Why Do Women Indoor Volleyball Players Wear Bun Huggers But Men Don't?

Maybe guys don't want the junk showing?

And probably not many people want to see it?

This is an interesting discussion in track as well. It sort of has become the "norm" and I wonder what pressure there is to conform and not buck the system.

Are you, by any chance, a liberal? This sounds like something a liberal would wonder.

Track athletes should run in basketball shorts.

No man should ever wear buns of any kind, please, for the sake of our eyes.

Never deal with any chick older than 19 or fatter than 105. (Although I have to really admit that a lot of those volleyball chicks qualify as FFF if they are at least 6', but only if they are thinner than 130.)

They wear boy shorts these days, not buns. Buns for volleyball went out in the 90s.

people want to see one thing

people don't want to see the other thing

showingup1 wrote:

They wear boy shorts these days, not buns. Buns for volleyball went out in the 90s.

These still look like bun huggers to me from a recent photo:

Koko the Gorilla wrote:

Are you, by any chance, a liberal? This sounds like something a liberal would wonder.

But is telling them to put on shorts that cover more like the men not being conservative?

Curiosity of Men Vs Women wrote:

showingup1 wrote:

They wear boy shorts these days, not buns. Buns for volleyball went out in the 90s.

These still look like bun huggers to me from a recent photo:

https://thevarsity.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/SPORTS-WOMENS_SEMINFINALS_VBALL_2020-NATHAN_CHINGTHE_VARSITY-SPIKE.jpg

Yes, they are definitely wearing shorts.

Women like to show off.

4:59 wrote:

Yes, they are definitely wearing shorts.

You can those shorts? I wear underwear with more coverage than those.

Men find women in bun huggers attractive.

Women don't find men in bun huggers attractive.

People in general like to wear clothing that makes them look attractive.

Eyeballs = revenue. Same with track or any sport. Neither men nor women seem to care too much how the men look. Both men and women seem to be intrigued by how the women look. We are animals, as are our eyeballs.

eyeballs wrote:

Eyeballs = revenue. Same with track or any sport. Neither men nor women seem to care too much how the men look. Both men and women seem to be intrigued by how the women look. We are animals, as are our eyeballs.

Yes.

Koko the Gorilla wrote:

Are you, by any chance, a liberal? This sounds like something a liberal would wonder.

Of course it's something a liberal would be questioning. It's all about confronting sexism and double standards that demean people. Would you want your daughter to be automatically expected to conform to such double standards? What if she has aspirations which would be jeopardized by such skimpy clothing? It doesn't hurt to be a bit considerate about whatever we take for granted; to question old assumptions.

eyeballs wrote:

Eyeballs = revenue. Same with track or any sport. Neither men nor women seem to care too much how the men look. Both men and women seem to be intrigued by how the women look. We are animals, as are our eyeballs.

So David Beckham's popularity among young women was all about his soccer skills? ;)

Koko the Gorilla wrote:

Are you, by any chance, a liberal? This sounds like something a liberal would wonder.

* How does the discussion topic on this thread have anything to do with Roth 401K?

* How does the discussion topic on this thread have anything to do with proper level of estate tax?

* How does the discussion topic on this thread have anything to do with Alternative Minimum Tax?

* How does the discussion topic on this thread have anything to do with troop levels in Afghanistan?

* How does the discussion topic on this thread have anything to do with federal government providing grants to private schools?

* How does the discussion topic on this thread have anything to do with privatization of of social security?

* How does the discussion topic on this thread have anything to do with American football?

You can ruin any discussion poster by accusing someone of voting for one side of the isle of the other. I can ask someone any of the seven questions above and determine quickly which political party someone supports. You want to ruin a thread by stating comments about shorts are a left or a right issue?

What kind of a moron can't tell the difference between boy shorts and bun huggers?

Curiosity of Men Vs Women wrote:

So I'm watching some indoor volleyball on YouTube and it dawned on me that the women are wearing bun huggers whereas the men don't. I don't see any functional advantage to bun huggers for women indoors for volleyball when in fact they look to be a disadvantage because of wedgies and constantly having to adjust them. Would shorts a bit longer like half-tights not be much more functional for the women? The guys just wear baggy shorts and are no where as short as the women bun huggers so it just shows there is no advantage for the women to be wearing them.

It's because ladies have bigger buns.