Hehir 2:09:28
5 men under 2:10
D'Amato 2:22:21
Hehir 2:09:28
5 men under 2:10
D'Amato 2:22:21
Sara Hall never runs well when the expectations are high. I hope I’m wrong.
Men: 2:08.59, Rory
Women: 2:20, Kelly’s Taylor
Kellyn not Kelly’s. Dumb spell check
Emma Bates - 2:22:23
Martin Hehir - 2:09:42
2 men under 2:10
5 women under 2:25
Hall 2:20:45
Albertson 2:09:15
3 sub 2:10
Albertson 2:08:12
Hall 2:19:35 AR
5 men under 2:10
Scott Fauble: 2:08:29
Sara Hall: 2:19:45
3 men under 2:10.
Martin Hehir-2:09:05
Sara Hall-2:20:48
3 men sub 2:10
Sara hall in 2:19:42
Emmanuel Rudolph in 2:09:55
I know I’m reaching on ER here
Cam Levins 2:08:19
Sara hall 2:20:23
4 men under 2:10
Kellyn Taylor: 2:20:54
Matthew McDonald: 2:08:37
7 Men under 2:10, 3 of those Men under 2:09
5 Women under 2:25, 3 of those Women under 2:23
Hall - 2:19:29
Fauble - 2:08:39
3 under 2:10
jda9ball wrote:
Kellyn Taylor: 2:20:54
Matthew McDonald: 2:08:37
7 Men under 2:10, 3 of those Men under 2:09
5 Women under 2:25, 3 of those Women under 2:23
I have Taylor at 2.20.44, doesn’t leave me much room for error. That’s ok though, I expect not to be in error today.
Shadrack Biwott 2:10.43
Sara Hall 2:19.35
0 men under 2:10
Emma Bates 2:22:22.
Jared Ward 2:09:09.
3 men under 2:10.
CJ Albertson 2:08:44
Emma Bates 2:23:32
6 men sub-2:10.
Faubles 2:10;50
Bates 2:23
Sara, sadly 2:25
No men, or women under 2:10
I find it hard to believe that no distance athlete will break 2.10. Isnt it a flat course? Wont they all be benefitting from shoe technology? Europeans are breaking 2.10. Have you fallen behind in training or just talent?
Ackley wrote:
CJ Albertson 2:08:13
Kellyn Taylor 2:23:34
. . . and 5 men under 2:10