ViperDom wrote:
NEGATIVE: Regular use could alter natural biomechanics in an undesirable way.
POSITIVE: Regular use could allow for a higher volume of injury-free training.
Consider using a non-zerodrop shoe regularly as these can put unnecessary strain on the calf muscles resulting in the opposite effect you are appreciating from the RC Elite. I love the escalantes for walking and jog in em once a week to switch it up but something lightweight with a 6mm drop like the Hoka Rincon or Kinvara are better suited for regular use. I love the REBEL as well and use that for pretty much anything but tend to "save" it for select runs to not get spoiled by the amazing fit/feel and preserve life(even tho i have two pairs!!)
Let us know how you make out.
Zero to near zero drop shoes shouldn't have any negative consequences on your calf/Achilles......your body will just adopt a more midfoot stride.
Back in the Stone Age.....you know, like 2000.....I switched to running in as minimal a shoe as I could following my second marathon because of the Achilles and calf issues I had with normal beefier "protective" shoes.
Listen kids.....runners in the 20s through the 70s-early 80s ran in very minimal shoes. The running shoe revolution starting in the 80s through today was created so that regular joes with poor biomechanics could run more frequently without pain. Thats just my opinion.
In my best years I put in 100-140 miles a week in racing shoes (this was before the minimalist revolution) and never had issues. You either have good biomechanics and foot strike or you don't. I assume the majority of you kids here do.
Now there is a limit. I got a pair of retro Nike Waffle Racers which were just a bit much. The best training shoe I had was probably the Brooks T3-T5.
I wore em till the outsoles were no good. There's only so much compression those midsoles will take (300-500mi) before they are as bad as they are gonna get.
Alan