Hillary was investigated and was found to have put classified documents onto her private server.
She got not so much as a slap on the hand.
Why?
This thread is about Trump. You can start a “Why is Hillary not locked up?” thread if you want to. If Trump is indicted, “What about Hillary?” will not be part of his defensive team’s strategy. He will be on trial and not Hillary.
The treatment of Hillary compared to what's been done to Trump is pertinent
Obama Presidential Library is run by the National Archives and Records Administration. It is not Obama's basement storage room.
From 2016-2018, the 30 million pages of classified and unclassified records were in a private facility in the Hoffman Estates where they were accessible to Obama before they were transferred to a NARA facility. Not included in that count were 10,000 documents that went missing from the archives before he left office.
Actually "American" history does begin with the creation of America via the American Revolution
Everyone knows American history began the moment North America broke away from Pangea...
There is no American history that does not include its existence as a colony. Its becoming a nation was formed from that colonial experience. Slavery began with the colonisation of America and continued as an unbroken thread into the new nation. It took a civil war to end it, but was effectively revived through Jim Crow. Its attitudes of white supremacy remain alive and well in the US today and Trump is one of their touchstones. Your guy. Of course.
That he intended to sell them seems over the top, even for Trump.
Trump would use them anyway he could. He would have no problem with selling them if he saw personal gain in it. He is devoid of moral compass. There is only self-interest.
FBI Director James Comey spoke to reporters about Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while serving as secretary of state. He said that although ...
Do you think slaves were just chained up and didn't do anything? The entire point of slavery was free labor. In a pre-industrial agrarian economy labor was the lifeblood of the economy. This fact doesn't condone slavery or even make any moral judgment at all. It's simply true.
American history literally begins with the War of Independence you GD fool. Prior to independence it was a British COLONY subject to.... THE BRITISH EMPIRE.
You are truly the dumbest person on this forum and that is really saying something with idiots like RealObvi and Louiseanna running around.
So if the slaves weren't chained up they were somehow "free"? And you don't think we can make any "moral judgment" about slavery. (It may also surprise you to know that a nation's existence as a colony is also part of its history).
It is surprising that in the 21st century we still encounter the dark recesses of the mediaeval mind. But here you are.
Are you seriously this stupid?
Where did I say they were free?
Where did I say you can't make a moral judgment about slavery?
You are truly too stupid to be believed.
Prior to independence there were no "Americans". A colony isn't a nation. It's a colony.
If it doesn't become a nation there is no history of the nation at all.
American history literally begins with independence.
You being too stupid to grasp the concept doesn't change reality.
Garland made the decision and not “the government”. If you check his Wikipedia bio, you’ll find he has an impeccable reputation and he’s an extremely cautious man. There’s no way he made the decision to serve the warrant based on sketchy evidence and he was well aware of the political backlash that would result from taking action against Trump.
Then why pick the biased magistrate judge instead of the district judge to get the warrant?
AGs and other parties to litigation do not get to pick magistrates (or district court judges). They get assigned magistrates through a random wheel system in the court. For search warrants in Florida (federal), you don't get to request a district court judge. The magistrates handle search warrants. This is court operation, and there is nothing sinister about it.
I think we could find enough individuals in the US to trump (that's the right word here) the complaints individuals have made about NZ by a million-fold in the US. You have an entire culture that you enslaved for several centuries and another upon which you attempted genocide. As a feeble deflection from the subject of the thread - why would anyone give a f*ck about NZ here - you only show that you have no idea how to present an argument, let alone understand it, but you do know how to flush a commode, as your user name indicates. The evidence is all over the thread.
Obama Presidential Library is run by the National Archives and Records Administration. It is not Obama's basement storage room.
From 2016-2018, the 30 million pages of classified and unclassified records were in a private facility in the Hoffman Estates where they were accessible to Obama before they were transferred to a NARA facility. Not included in that count were 10,000 documents that went missing from the archives before he left office.
The Hoffman Estates location is a NARA facility. NARA staff organizing the material. Your point is just incorrect whataboutism.
The unclassified documents from the Obama administration are at the official Obama Presidential Library in Hoffman Estates; classified material is in Maryland.
From 2016-2018, the 30 million pages of classified and unclassified records were in a private facility in the Hoffman Estates where they were accessible to Obama before they were transferred to a NARA facility. Not included in that count were 10,000 documents that went missing from the archives before he left office.
The Hoffman Estates location is a NARA facility. NARA staff organizing the material. Your point is just incorrect whataboutism.
Haha! Engaging in whataboutism (Carmine's only "argument" ever) is bad enough C-level posting. But when you can't even get the whataboutism correct, you may have sunk to new internet lows.
We need a name for incorrect whataboutism. I mean other than lying. There has to be some name for it. Whataboutthisfantasyism?
This thread is about Trump. You can start a “Why is Hillary not locked up?” thread if you want to. If Trump is indicted, “What about Hillary?” will not be part of his defensive team’s strategy. He will be on trial and not Hillary.
The treatment of Hillary compared to what's been done to Trump is pertinent
Why? I believe your accusations about Hillary are inaccurate but it’s irrelevant regarding Trump. Do you believe the prosecution will need to prove that Hillary was innocent to get a conviction for Trump?
So if the slaves weren't chained up they were somehow "free"? And you don't think we can make any "moral judgment" about slavery. (It may also surprise you to know that a nation's existence as a colony is also part of its history).
It is surprising that in the 21st century we still encounter the dark recesses of the mediaeval mind. But here you are.
Are you seriously this stupid?
Where did I say they were free?
Where did I say you can't make a moral judgment about slavery?
You are truly too stupid to be believed.
Prior to independence there were no "Americans". A colony isn't a nation. It's a colony.
If it doesn't become a nation there is no history of the nation at all.
American history literally begins with independence.
You being too stupid to grasp the concept doesn't change reality.
Did the history of the earth only begin when humans formed language and started calling it “earth”?
The Hoffman Estates location is a NARA facility. NARA staff organizing the material. Your point is just incorrect whataboutism.
Haha! Engaging in whataboutism (Carmine's only "argument" ever) is bad enough C-level posting. But when you can't even get the whataboutism correct, you may have sunk to new internet lows.
We need a name for incorrect whataboutism. I mean other than lying. There has to be some name for it. Whataboutthisfantasyism?
Exposing double standards and hypocrisy is not what aboutism.
What aboutism is when confronted with horrific crimes against humanity by Israel, apoligists say why aren't you critiquing Saudi Araba (right after they call you a liar and racist).
