Potentially Suspicious Runner To Run 836 Miles in 9 Days for "Charity"

Funny that. wrote:

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

Still nothing forthcoming about the 2016 Bournemouth Marathon result for Dave, how odd to be so verbose on other subjects but silent on this one.

Terrie, "verbose" is a word meaning 'long winded bullshit', which you seem to excel in when it suits you, it doesn't amount to much, in fact nothing, but you're good at it. However, you're very silent when it comes to fact based evidence, accountability on money, goods, services, etc, etc. Funny that.

I asked this in a message to their page, and just got this response, then BLOCKED.

John O'Groats to Lands End 2018 Ridiculously Long Run and Ride Challenge

235 people like this

Community

Hi

Re this LEJOG David is doing.

He mentioned someone was giving 5 grand to the charity if he went sub 3:30 at a marathon. Who was that? A sponsor? Can't see it added to the charity money pages?

Thanks.

John O'Groats to Lands End 2018 Ridiculously Long Run and Ride Challenge

Thanks for messaging us. We apolagise but we are unable to respond to private messages at this time. Thank you

Terrie, how'd ya go with this? wrote:

Nope. Still wrong wrote:

The Fete did not happen, and I will contact WWTW my self tomorrow to find out why are they are saying it did. As Andrew knows full well it did not. Along with all in my village.

Terrie, how'd ya go with this?

Terrie, any update yet or are WWTW giving you the cold shoulder? Also, how's it going on the evidence front, can we expect to see anything any time soon? Just askin'.

Since Terrie can't fake anything with Dave cheating at the Bournemouth Marathon and WWTW doesn't want to deal with her, Terrie has posted a photo of a PRINTED (what is wrong with her?) out email from Scott Overall of London Marathon from May 17th as her "proof" that Dave didn't cheat in the 2016 London Marathon.

http://imgur.com/a/QpqzZ

This email is from the time Scott Overall was evading my emails asking for the evidence. Since Scott refused to reply, I got the higher up Hugh Brasher involved with an email on May 21st and this cheating is still being investigated by Hugh.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=647640998773064&id=496059083931257&comment_id=650704431800054&notif_t=feed_comment_reply&notif_id=1496479180724574&ref=m_notif

A record of the replies to that Facebook post. Can somebody post what Hugh Brashner is now investigating the cheating? I can post on Terrie's pages.

From one of Terrie's replies on the FB page, she says:

Dave has run several marathons as you know and NEVER cheated so why would he decide to cheat this one?

Guess Terrie didn't expect us to show Dave got caught for cheating at the 2016 Bournemouth Marathon and is now avoiding the question like the plague.

The deafening silence on the subject of Bournemouth interests me. I was expecting​ a denial that he ran it at all despite the evidence that he did.

Let's see if we can make Terrie respond about 2016 Bournemouth. From the race photos of Dave at the event we can see him running beside runner 3651 that finished with:

Pos 1345

Photos for 3651 > 4h 41m 30s

Half way: 2h 0m 13s

Gun Time:4h 44m 56s

Over 45 : Male

Yet Dave finished in:

bib 3106 with a finishing position of #359

Finish: 3h 43m 50s

Half way: 2h 1m 32s

So somehow Dave was pretty much near this other runner for the first half of the marathon and then gained an entire hour on him in the second half.

Must have been a faulty camera.

From the Bournemouth Marathon course map, you can clearly see how easy it would have been Dave to cheat by cutting the course. He wouldn't even need a car or train. He could just walk to the other side of the street and chop off a huge chunk of the course since it is out and back.

https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/bournemouthmarathon-com/media/2015/08/07094309/BMF_Map_marathon.jpg

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Let's see if we can make Terrie respond about 2016 Bournemouth. From the race photos of Dave at the event we can see him running beside runner 3651 that finished with:

Pos 1345

Photos for 3651 > 4h 41m 30s

Half way: 2h 0m 13s

Gun Time:4h 44m 56s

Over 45 : Male

Yet Dave finished in:

bib 3106 with a finishing position of #359

Finish: 3h 43m 50s

Half way: 2h 1m 32s

So somehow Dave was pretty much near this other runner for the first half of the marathon and then gained an entire hour on him in the second half.

https://www.marathon-photos.com/scripts/event.py?template=MPX2&new_search=1&event=Sports%2FCPUK%2F2016%2FBournemouth%20Marathon%20Festival&match=3106

Hey, wait a minute.

It looks like Dave ran a 1:42 half-marathon (7:48 average pace per mile) for the 2nd half of this marathon…on a course where it would be really easy to cut the course.

That 2nd half-marathon in this marathon race is about 20 minutes faster than all of Dave's other half-marathon races that he has run around 2:00 (9:10 average mile pace).

Unfortunately, there in no way Dave Reading can run 13.1 miles at 7:48 pace…especially after already running 13.1 miles in 2:01:32.

It would be hard for Dave to run about 3 miles at that pace.

Dave should post a video of himself running a real 5K race or 5K on a track at 7:48 pace.

That should be easy for Dave.

Come on Dave and Terrie.

Let's see if Dave can really run 7:48 pace for 3 miles...instead of RIDING A BIKE on Day 2 of his epic LEJOG Record RUN.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

From the Bournemouth Marathon course map, you can clearly see how easy it would have been Dave to cheat by cutting the course. He wouldn't even need a car or train. He could just walk to the other side of the street and chop off a huge chunk of the course since it is out and back.

Yup, for argument's sake, after the 13.1 mat, he could have skipped over to just past 16 then trundled along to just past 17, stop for a "toilet break" then have a fag and a lie down for an hour or so then back on to the course at 26 miles.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

From one of Terrie's replies on the FB page, she says:

Dave has run several marathons as you know and NEVER cheated so why would he decide to cheat this one?

Guess Terrie didn't expect us to show Dave got caught for cheating at the 2016 Bournemouth Marathon and is now avoiding the question like the plague.

I think for London he didn't wear the chip AT ALL, and just ran a section or two of it. Then pretended it was broken. Or broke it himself by dropping in boiling water or something!

It never worked at the start for sure.

She refuses to show us the Tom Tom data. Scott is too thick to examine it as genuine. Data can be manipulated. I want to see the Tom Tom data Terrie.

If you are so convinced he didnt cheat, why not let us see it?

And why do you have NOTHING to say about Bournemouth?

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

John O'Groats to Lands End 2018 Ridiculously Long Run and Ride Challenge

Yes of course. Let me explain. As said before the timing chip did not work and so London Marathon manually entered the start and finish time. They have given. As for fundraising every one we have ever raised money for has received there money and clarified that. Also said before we have provided every thing asked of us and it is now time to move on.

The subject is now closed.

All these forums have caused massive media attention and You will get the opportunity to read every thing in due course. Thank you.

Like · Report · 6 hours ago

2

[/quote]

Subject closed? In your dreams Terrie! Hugh himself is looking into the London result.

Scam_Watcheroo, When Hugh gets back to you, be sure to tell him about Bournemouth, and remind him watch data can be forged, but that WE can suss when data has been tampered with, so can we see the London Tom Tom data please?

I just send Hugh an email telling him to contact the Bournemouth Marathon race director about Dave cheating there so Hugh can see how they did it at another race.

It looks like Hugh has been on vacation this past week since Hugh's email auto-replied saying he is back from vacation this Monday June 5th.

I'll ask if he can share some details of what times Dave and Terrie are claiming and what the GPS data contains and if they can share it.

I could be wrong but is it the case that TomTom data isn't accessible on the device as it is with Garmin and FIT files?

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

From one of Terrie's replies on the FB page, she says:

Dave has run several marathons as you know and NEVER cheated so why would he decide to cheat this one?

Guess Terrie didn't expect us to show Dave got caught for cheating at the 2016 Bournemouth Marathon and is now avoiding the question like the plague.

Terrie, no one believes you or Dave any longer, and I mean no one:

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

I could be wrong but is it the case that TomTom data isn't accessible on the device as it is with Garmin and FIT files?

Huh? He can post to Strava and make it public. Terrie claims she already sent Scott the data, so why can't WE see it. I doubt Scott sent it to be examined to test for it being tampered with.

Watch data wrote:

Huh? He can post to Strava and make it public. Terrie claims she already sent Scott the data, so why can't WE see it. I doubt Scott sent it to be examined to test for it being tampered with.

Yeah, you're probably right, all Scott or Terrie need to do is post it here and it'll all be cleared up one way or the other.

Still won't clear up the blatant lying about running 3:12 though.

Reading's are Blatant liers. wrote:

Watch data wrote:

Huh? He can post to Strava and make it public. Terrie claims she already sent Scott the data, so why can't WE see it. I doubt Scott sent it to be examined to test for it being tampered with.

Yeah, you're probably right, all Scott or Terrie need to do is post it here and it'll all be cleared up one way or the other.

Still won't clear up the blatant lying about running 3:12 though.

One thing is for sure - If she sent Scott that Tom Tom data, it was manipulated, and neither of those two clowns would be able to do that, so they got help.

Dave is not capable of a 4:19, and certainly not a 3:12, so i want to see that watch data. It can be faked. But some of us can test for that.

If it was real data from a real 4:19 legit London she would let us see it.

Scott is so dodgy she probably just sent a photo of a Tom Tom screen saying 4:19 and he accepted that without seeing a PROPER link showing HR and cadence and NOT tampered with,

Come on Terrie. Lers see.

It's really not over you know, as you'll have to show Hugh himself the REAL data, and he's back in his office on Monday!