Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

obvious problem wrote:

Hardloper wrote:

What exactly is the point then?

The special counsel was set up to look into Russian interference in the election. Something Trumpers deny happened.

No one has been denying that. Like I told you several pages ago, all countries try to influence each other's elections and this one was no different. Why did you ignore it?

DiscoGary wrote:

None of this should be hard to believe. Hillary Democrats rigged the primary against Bernie, and they could see no reason why they couldn't rig the general election against Trump. This is what happens when the MSM sides with one political party and stops doing it's job of holding those in power accountable. Those in power start to think they are above the law ... and for a long time they were.

Trump = reckoning

I would say that you are literally one of the most delusional people in the world, except, there are 1000's of your fellow right wing nut-cases that think exactly the same as you do. So, sadly, you have lots of company.

Hardloper wrote:

obvious problem wrote:

The special counsel was set up to look into Russian interference in the election. Something Trumpers deny happened.

No one has been denying that. Like I told you several pages ago, all countries try to influence each other's elections and this one was no different. Why did you ignore it?

Trump has been denying it. He has called many of these reports fake news. If they did interfere and we caught them, why aren't we punishing them? I thought Trump was a brave and staunch defender of America and its principles? Congress passed the sanctions, so obviously they aren't afraid of starting WWIII. What is Trump afraid of? The lengths you guys will go to defend him is unbelievable.

obvious problem wrote:

Hardloper wrote:

What exactly is the point then?

The special counsel was set up to look into Russian interference in the election. Something Trumpers deny happened.

The fact that some of the evidence leads back to the Trump campaign is just one line of inquiry. Whether or not it can be proven that Russian ads actually changed anyones vote is largely immaterial.

They have nothing. If they had anything we would know already. This is the Democrats version of the Birther movement, except the Birther movement had more evidence.

Erfworm wrote:

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-i-really-believe-putin-when-he-tells-me-russia-didnt-interfere-in-the-election-2017-11

President Obama said that Russia didn't interfere in the election. He said it wasn't possible. Why doesn't someone ask him if it happened?

DiscoGary wrote:[/b

It matters a lot whether or not they were successful. Governments regularly mess with other countries. We don't start WWIII over a very minor incident that caused no discernible damage. Well, sane people wouldn't. Democrats would because Trump's win made them lose their minds.

So is *that* what Trump was trying to achieve by being Putin's best buddy, and wanting to drop sanctions on his country despite countless egregious acts by Russia over the last decade, avoid "WWIII" ?? What a guy.

OTOH, he didn't mind antagonizing a different, less predictable, loony dictator with nukes (potentially pushing us towards WWIII) over some insults he received from him on twitter. And his unconditional support of Israel and the detestable Bibi could also very well lead to a huge regional war.

Yes, the peace loving Trump (who wants military parades and just pumped up our military with billions of more $'s).

(Putin said some nice things about Trump, and tried to/likely succeeded in helping him win the election. This is why Trump likes him. It has nothing to do with him being prudent with a potential nuclear power, and you know it.)

DiscoGary wrote:

Erfworm wrote:

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-i-really-believe-putin-when-he-tells-me-russia-didnt-interfere-in-the-election-2017-11

President Obama said that Russia didn't interfere in the election. He said it wasn't possible. Why doesn't someone ask him if it happened?

When did he say this? If he did he was wrong. That's ok with me. I bet if you asked Obama now he would say Russia interfered.

Why does Trump believe Putin before all US intelligence agencies and Congress? Now, why shouldn't Russia be punished for interfering in our election again?

Because everyone does it? Because they only hacked the DNC computers? We should allow this to happen to avoid WWIII?

Hardloper wrote:

obvious problem wrote:

The special counsel was set up to look into Russian interference in the election. Something Trumpers deny happened.

No one has been denying that. Like I told you several pages ago, all countries try to influence each other's elections and this one was no different. Why did you ignore it?

BS

Disingenuous answer. Trump himself has been denying it in the face of overwhelming evidence. You can look up the relevant tweets. I can’t be bothered.

obvious problem wrote:

Hardloper wrote:

No one has been denying that. Like I told you several pages ago, all countries try to influence each other's elections and this one was no different. Why did you ignore it?

BS

Disingenuous answer. Trump himself has been denying it in the face of overwhelming evidence. You can look up the relevant tweets. I can’t be bothered.

This is all I can find - doesn't look like denial to me:

Hardloper wrote:

obvious problem wrote:

BS

Disingenuous answer. Trump himself has been denying it in the face of overwhelming evidence. You can look up the relevant tweets. I can’t be bothered.

This is all I can find - doesn't look like denial to me:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/897411177583702016?lang=en

And yet 4 months later (November) he was quoted that he believed Putin when he said he didn't interfere.

I guess that doesn't count because it wasn't tweeted right?

You guys defending Trump really should stop. He is going to make fools of you.

Erfworm wrote:

And yet 4 months later (November) he was quoted that he believed Putin when he said he didn't interfere.

I guess that doesn't count because it wasn't tweeted right?

He (or you?) told me to search Tweets so that's where I looked.

cup of black coffee wrote:

You guys defending Trump really should stop. He is going to make fools of you.

You have to be kidding. Trump has made the entire Democrat party look like fools, and the eReps, and the MSM, and the bureaucracy, and academia, and Harveywood, and ....

Hardloper wrote:

Erfworm wrote:

And yet 4 months later (November) he was quoted that he believed Putin when he said he didn't interfere.

I guess that doesn't count because it wasn't tweeted right?

He (or you?) told me to search Tweets so that's where I looked.

Whether or not your were misled on where to do your search for Trump's denial of Russian interference in our election is besides the point. What's truly comical and disturbing is that you apparently weren't aware or chose to forget that Trump has regularly done this, and mocked his intelligence agencies' efforts in unearthing these facts. Maybe this will refresh your selective memory-

DiscoGary wrote:

cup of black coffee wrote:

You guys defending Trump really should stop. He is going to make fools of you.

You have to be kidding. Trump has made the entire Democrat party look like fools, and the eReps, and the MSM, and the bureaucracy, and academia, and Harveywood, and ....

And that's all that matters.

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

Whether or not your were misled on where to do your search for Trump's denial of Russian interference in our election is besides the point. What's truly comical and disturbing is that you apparently weren't aware or chose to forget that Trump has regularly done this, and mocked his intelligence agencies' efforts in unearthing these facts. Maybe this will refresh your selective memory-

Actual intentional collusion with Russia is, at this point, a made up story. The Russia thing (whether interference or collusion) is indeed a Dem excuse for losing the election. The "interference" we know about was tiny and was intention to create a divisive political climate, which is why many of the ads they bought were for lib causes like BLM. Politifact of course cannot discern between the two.

Erfworm wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

President Obama said that Russia didn't interfere in the election. He said it wasn't possible. Why doesn't someone ask him if it happened?

When did he say this?

Yes, care to elaborate Gary? Or was this an "alternative fact" or "not intended to be factual statement", or some other right wing bizarre explanation for when you guys regularly say stuff that isn't true, but don't want to be called on it?

Hardloper wrote:

Nothingburger

You must be new to this thread. ... At least you rarely post under your real name, that is.