This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
In January 2023, Powell was sick with Covid. The Federal Reserve put out a statement saying he was "up to date with COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.".
Spewing lies, obfuscation and BS is not good for you.
Completely unrelated to what I said. You’re just a random word generator at this point. I question your grip on reality
Harambro has reached his boiling point. I think he’s done with this thread. He’s tired of everyone calling him out for the misinformation he’s been spewing lately.
See ya, Harambro. ✌️We hardly knew you. At least we’ll have Panama City Beach in ‘04. Memories. 😂
No you don’t. You talk out of both sides of your mouth SIMULTANEOUSLY before the data is in, aka lab leak versus zoonosis. That’s exactly what you were doing. It’s not an opinion evolving with data, it’s holding two conflicting positions at the same time. More like lack of courage.
Were you part of Collins’ we have to immediately denigrate the lab leak hypothesis, undermine the Great Barrington Declaration authors, and go with the arbitrary 6’ distancing rule too that we now admit was based on anything but science?
Study that looks at Covid vaccine "imprinting" and concludes that it broadly protects against Covid variants.
Unlike immunity to influenza virus, prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2 doesn't inhibit later vaccine responses. Rather, it promotes the development of broadly inhibitory antibodies, the researchers report.
I love data, but only when it confirms my bias; otherwise, I stick my head in the sand and pretend it doesn’t exist. Then I falsely attribute a position to someone and argue that point instead of the one they actually made. I then scream, “provide me evidence!” for that false position.
No you don’t. You talk out of both sides of your mouth SIMULTANEOUSLY before the data is in, aka lab leak versus zoonosis. That’s exactly what you were doing. It’s not an opinion evolving with data, it’s holding two conflicting positions at the same time. More like lack of courage.
Were you part of Collins’ we have to immediately denigrate the lab leak hypothesis, undermine the Great Barrington Declaration authors, and go with the arbitrary 6’ distancing rule too that we now admit was based on anything but science?
We’ll never know the answer probably so admonishing someone for stating their opinion before “all the data are in” is silly.
It’s totally fine to say “zoonosis is most likely but lab leak is possible”
Shocker, but you don’t have to be a dogmatic absolutist about every issue. Uncertainty is ok.
Study that looks at Covid vaccine "imprinting" and concludes that it broadly protects against Covid variants.
Unlike immunity to influenza virus, prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2 doesn't inhibit later vaccine responses. Rather, it promotes the development of broadly inhibitory antibodies, the researchers report.
No you don’t. You talk out of both sides of your mouth SIMULTANEOUSLY before the data is in, aka lab leak versus zoonosis. That’s exactly what you were doing. It’s not an opinion evolving with data, it’s holding two conflicting positions at the same time. More like lack of courage.
Were you part of Collins’ we have to immediately denigrate the lab leak hypothesis, undermine the Great Barrington Declaration authors, and go with the arbitrary 6’ distancing rule too that we now admit was based on anything but science?
We’ll never know the answer probably so admonishing someone for stating their opinion before “all the data are in” is silly.
It’s totally fine to say “zoonosis is most likely but lab leak is possible”
Shocker, but you don’t have to be a dogmatic absolutist about every issue. Uncertainty is ok.
Totally missing the point, as usual, and then backpedaling. You (2600bore) don’t get to say how compelling the lab leak theory is elsewhere but come on here and say it looks far more like zoonosis AT the same time. That’s double talk and undermines credibility.
Study that looks at Covid vaccine "imprinting" and concludes that it broadly protects against Covid variants.
Unlike immunity to influenza virus, prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2 doesn't inhibit later vaccine responses. Rather, it promotes the development of broadly inhibitory antibodies, the researchers report.
Nice find. This is part of the reason that vaccines have shown broader immunity than infection driven immunity. Making them superior
Nope, this only looks at humoral immunity.
Nonetheless, vaccines can be equivalent or “superior” on the margins but natural immunity good enough for most people. That is not the same thing as suggesting everyone should’ve strived for natural immunity vs Covid and what a dumb idea that is, even though you will turn this into that next.
The Royal College of Physicians of Ireland awards preeminent physician, Dr Anthony Fauci the prestigious Stearne Medal for his outstanding contribution to pu...
Nice find. This is part of the reason that vaccines have shown broader immunity than infection driven immunity. Making them superior
Nope, this only looks at humoral immunity.
Nonetheless, vaccines can be equivalent or “superior” on the margins but natural immunity good enough for most people. That is not the same thing as suggesting everyone should’ve strived for natural immunity vs Covid and what a dumb idea that is, even though you will turn this into that next.
Either way, it’s a good thing Omicron infection, AFTER vaccination or infection ended the pandemic. Too bad the Fed can’t end the inflation epidemic created by the pandemic over-stimulus.
Your indoctrination seems hardwired at this point, but once in a while I like to trigger you dummies just for fun. Here’s my contribution for today… I’ll be back after 5,000 more posts by Harambe /2600bro… so next Thursday-ish.
We’ll never know the answer probably so admonishing someone for stating their opinion before “all the data are in” is silly.
It’s totally fine to say “zoonosis is most likely but lab leak is possible”
Shocker, but you don’t have to be a dogmatic absolutist about every issue. Uncertainty is ok.
Totally missing the point, as usual, and then backpedaling. You (2600bore) don’t get to say how compelling the lab leak theory is elsewhere but come on here and say it looks far more like zoonosis AT the same time. That’s double talk and undermines credibility.
Not gonna read it but I wouldn’t go to Collin’s for advice on that - not really his area of expertise. Regardless 6’ makes intuitive sense. Don’t get all wound up in details bro
Nonetheless, vaccines can be equivalent or “superior” on the margins but natural immunity good enough for most people. That is not the same thing as suggesting everyone should’ve strived for natural immunity vs Covid and what a dumb idea that is, even though you will turn this into that next.
Either way, it’s a good thing Omicron infection, AFTER vaccination or infection ended the pandemic. Too bad the Fed can’t end the inflation epidemic created by the pandemic over-stimulus.
T cell immunity is broader for vaccines too. You have no evidence “omicron ended the pandemic” you just REALLY don’t like it when I say that vaccines ended it.
I have evidence that a large fraction of the improvements in severe disease and death rates occurred thanks to vaccination and not omicron infection. That’s all the evidence I need, and, is vastly more than you’ve ever provided. Your argument basically amount to “nuh uh” and restating what you desperately hope to be true. But it’s not.
No you don’t. You talk out of both sides of your mouth SIMULTANEOUSLY before the data is in, aka lab leak versus zoonosis. That’s exactly what you were doing. It’s not an opinion evolving with data, it’s holding two conflicting positions at the same time. More like lack of courage.
Were you part of Collins’ we have to immediately denigrate the lab leak hypothesis, undermine the Great Barrington Declaration authors, and go with the arbitrary 6’ distancing rule too that we now admit was based on anything but science?
We’ll never know the answer probably so admonishing someone for stating their opinion before “all the data are in” is silly.
It’s totally fine to say “zoonosis is most likely but lab leak is possible”
Shocker, but you don’t have to be a dogmatic absolutist about every issue. Uncertainty is ok.
There’s no uncertainty. no Chinese dude bit the head off a bat and created Covid. the narrative was established by the CDC/Fauci/WHO and others, who all lied to The People about virtually every aspect of COVID. This was created in a lab folks, to believe otherwise would be a suspension of reality.
so have an honest debate, it must start there. this is the core principle which needs to be agreed on, else you are terminal.
Either way, it’s a good thing Omicron infection, AFTER vaccination or infection ended the pandemic. Too bad the Fed can’t end the inflation epidemic created by the pandemic over-stimulus.
T cell immunity is broader for vaccines too. You have no evidence “omicron ended the pandemic” you just REALLY don’t like it when I say that vaccines ended it.
I have evidence that a large fraction of the improvements in severe disease and death rates occurred thanks to vaccination and not omicron infection. That’s all the evidence I need, and, is vastly more than you’ve ever provided. Your argument basically amount to “nuh uh” and restating what you desperately hope to be true. But it’s not.
I really don’t care that you say the vaccines ended it, doesn’t bother me in the least actually, because my view is either vaccines OR natural immunity ended it, together. Three shots for the highest risk plus Omicron infection or Delta, followed by Omicron, ended it.
You will recall that the CDC itself produced the data that showed that three shots PLUS infection was only marginally better than ZERO shots PLUS infection against bad outcomes.
